|
|
|
|
 |
February 20th, 2003, 09:16 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
Quote:
However, for some reason there seems to be a preference for game2.
|
Everyone is afraid of the Worms of Woe in Game1. Askan was so intimidated, he quit altogether... |
February 20th, 2003, 09:37 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
February 21st, 2003, 12:33 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
Quote:
|
Everyone is afraid of the Worms of Woe in Game1.
|
Nope, worms are icky!
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|
February 21st, 2003, 01:27 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kiel, Germany
Posts: 1,896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
say spoon, what are those weird circles on your forehead...   |
February 21st, 2003, 02:14 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 364
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
quote:
Originally posted by sparhawk:
True Geoschmo, but game 2 now has 12 player: only two people have to leave????
sparhawk
|
That is correct. Because Askan has chosen not to continue, that reduces the number of available players and reduces the number needed to eliminate to get to 20 after this round. There are still five more eligible players that have not joined their round 4 game. It's still entirely possible one or mroe of these players will choose not to continue, further reducing the number of players. If more then 2 of the 5 do so I will have to kick one of the players from game 2 and have them join game 1. But I won't know that for a few days.
Geoschmo
I don't think forcing a player to switch is fair!! If the switched player has been cooperating with other players in his own group he all of a sudden is isolated in the new group without any friends. If group 1 has only ten players they should just start with that amount and force them to eliminate one of their players. Merging should happen all at once not piece meal.
|
February 21st, 2003, 02:21 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
Quote:
Originally posted by rextorres:
I don't think forcing a player to switch is fair!! ...
|
Correct. And that's why I locked game 2 when I did. However you will be pleased to know it's no longer a question of anyone needing to switch games cause Game 1 has 11 players now. Game one is going to have 11, 12, or 13 players. Whatever the final number game 2 can keep it's 12 and things will be as even as is possible.
I don't care which game has more as long as neither has more than one more than the other.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
February 21st, 2003, 02:25 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 364
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Survivor 2" Round 10 is about to start
Cool! Thanks for organizing this BTW!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
I am sure that's not it. But if it makes you feel better to think so... 
Hybrid Mode