OT: Mediaval - Total War

sachmo · #1 October 22nd, 2002, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sachmo:
How does this game compare with Europa Universalis? They sound rather similar? Also, would anyone mind posting the minimum hardware specs including required HD space? I would look it up myself, but I'm a bit busy at work...

Anyone? I was thinking of buying it at lunch, but I already own EUII. If I knew why it was better, then I could buy it without a second thought. As it stands, it sounds like more of the same...

mac5732 · #2 October 22nd, 2002, 06:28 PM

sachmo. its worth it to buy at least in my opinion, if youj've played Shogun and liked it you'll enjoy Medevil. You get to fight your battles tactically on the battlefield, mano to mano, army to army, nothing like seeing 100 knights charging a square or seiging a castle with seige engines. You win if you win the battle, so its up to you on the battlefield. This is what makes it fun to play.

In EU battles are fought by computer, in Medevil you fight your own on the actual battle field with actual amount of troops.

This is my opinion Only
maybe play a demo if you can find one on the site

just some ideas mac

#3 October 22nd, 2002, 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sachmo:

quote:
Originally posted by sachmo:
How does this game compare with Europa Universalis? They sound rather similar? Also, would anyone mind posting the minimum hardware specs including required HD space? I would look it up myself, but I'm a bit busy at work...

Anyone? I was thinking of buying it at lunch, but I already own EUII. If I knew why it was better, then I could buy it without a second thought. As it stands, it sounds like more of the same...

Sachmo,

The two games aren't really comparable. The Total War series is really a 3-d, realtime, grand tactical battle game - with a strategic layer built on top, there just to generate more battles for you to fight.

Now Medieval, the latest in the series, is a lot more interesting strategically then Shogun was. It's got some fun new elements like having to keep your Royal Family alive and generating heirs, dealing with different religions (Crusades and Jihads etc). But the diplomacy is incredibly crude, the economics ditto - and who cares? The game's about fighting lots of battles, then finding ways to build better troops so you can fight more battles. The huge variety of troop types and the different terrain types stop it from getting repetative (so this time I've got to fight my entire army across one bridge? And he's got how many archers?)

Do you like the idea of fighting medieval-era battles in 3-d and realtime? If not, don't buy Medieval.

Mark

sachmo · #4 October 22nd, 2002, 08:15 PM

Thanks for the input guys. From the descriptions, and from one game story I was reading, it sounded a lot like EU, but now I know that it's mostly a RTS. Thanks!

Mephisto · #5 October 22nd, 2002, 10:48 PM

Good old Tigga, always want to explore where no one would dare to go...

It will give you the trait "Incest", which has a huge malus for your piety (and maybe some other areas, can't remember).

Quote:

Originally posted by Growltigga:
One thing I am slightly concerned about, the rulebook says you should not marry your princesses to your princes, now obviously I can see the genetic drawbacks of this (not to mention the moral issues) but curiousity leads me to wonder what happens IF YOU DO try and marry one of your princesses to one of your princes? has any sick weirdo tried to do this yet?

Growltigga · #6 October 23rd, 2002, 03:52 PM

Mephisto, thanks for that but I could point out (only if I was being difficult you realise) that you must have tried this option for you to know what happens if you do it!!

mac5732 · #7 October 23rd, 2002, 04:07 PM

Sex in wargames, what next ???

Next they'll be putting in LH look a likes..... and I'll never stop playing the game..