|
|
|
 |
|

September 23rd, 2009, 05:39 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Thanks for the feedback and ideas AreaOfEffect. I can certainly see the benefits of asking each person to list a few of their talents and skills, and then pooling that data together in the first post (to allow updating)
Although not sure if that approach will work with everything though. Things like Modding Skill and Dom Knowledge should be fine, but if a system existed where all you had to do to be considered a 'vet' (or good rusher, turtler, nation manager, late-game player, call it what you will) was to say "Hello, my name is Paul, and I'm a Vet" then I can quickly see problems appearing.
The one thing I really want to avoid is to have constant questions raised, either on the public forum, or via private PM, about who should be called a vet. The one thing that would derail this project is posts or PM's like "ZXY said he's a vet so you put him on the list. Why? Surely you know he's rubbish". And the best way I can think of at present to avoid this happening is to have a voting system where a large percentage of players would have to agree with a persons 'vet' status before he/she became one. Although I'm certainly open to suggestions if anyone can think of other ways this scenario can be avoid.
But please keep the thoughts and ideas coming everyone. All very much appreciated. Real Life work pressures and commitments mean I'm a good week or two away from even thinking about this project yet, so the more ideas I have to work with when the time comes, the better the outcome will be (hopefully  )
|

September 23rd, 2009, 11:59 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
It might help to avoid some of the distaste for such a system if you widened the categories to other areas where the request for a "vet" comes up. Mods have been mentioned and of course some people come to mind right away such as Sombre. Others might be Maps, Game Generation, Graphics, Installation, possibly even as far as listing specific nations to get some idea of who people automatic think of when someone says they have a problem with that. That would give less of a binary "on the approved list or not" situation for more of a "everyone can be good at something" compromise. Rather like the various tv/movie awards 
|

September 23rd, 2009, 12:01 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 434
Thanks: 16
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf Parker
It might help to avoid some of the distaste for such a system if you widened the categories to other areas where the request for a "vet" comes up.
|
Yes, I should've been more specific.
Who here feels like enough of a vet to captain a team?
|

September 23rd, 2009, 09:45 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Like I said, determining who is a vet is clearly ambiguous and extremely subjective. In a system of qualifications I would never apply 'vet' status at all. Also, a system of nomination means that someone other then the player in question must bring up the vote to grant a qualification. Then a minimum number of players need to second the motion. Finally, the player up for nomination would have to agree that the qualification describes them.
Just a thought.
|

September 23rd, 2009, 02:34 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
Like I said, determining who is a vet is clearly ambiguous and extremely subjective. In a system of qualifications I would never apply 'vet' status at all. Also, a system of nomination means that someone other then the player in question must bring up the vote to grant a qualification. Then a minimum number of players need to second the motion. Finally, the player up for nomination would have to agree that the qualification describes them.
Just a thought.
|
clearly ambiguous ... lol = )
|

September 23rd, 2009, 12:15 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Gandalf has 158 thanks - he's clearly your man 
|

September 23rd, 2009, 04:43 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispedersen
clearly ambiguous ... lol = )
|
chrispedersen, your a complete oxymoron. 
|

September 30th, 2009, 09:20 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
AlgaeNymph, your goal is clear: After all those failed attempts at "Dom3 ranks" and "Dom3 ladders", you will have to host a "Dom3 MP Battle for Vetness" to determine the outcome.
I'm a veteran timewaster.
|

September 30th, 2009, 12:57 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 39
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lch
...you will have to host a "Dom3 MP Battle for Vetness" to determine the outcome. 
|
Wasn't that the Artifact game?
(Hint: Micah won)
|

September 30th, 2009, 01:56 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Who here is a Vet?
No. No-one won artifacts. No-one but father time.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|