|
|
|
|
 |
|
January 8th, 2010, 11:42 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
Hmmm, might make a compelling case for taking misfortune scales...
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
January 8th, 2010, 01:19 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 122
Thanks: 5
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
It's a 0 encumbrance unit, so it never gains fatigue from melee regardless of what armour it is wearing.
|
January 8th, 2010, 01:23 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
A Tomb King (or any enc 0 commander) will gain 0 fatigue from fighting even wearing Black Steel (or any armor) with or without the bless.
He will get 4 (IIRC) additional fatigue from spellcasting due to the armor. Since he's casting 0 fatigue H spells this should be just 4/spell.
The 2 points of reinvig from the E4 bless will remove this and will also counter any fatigue from spells, special attacks, auras or other sources. However most such sources will build up fatigue much too fast for the reinvig to counter.
Short answer: The bless works, but he doesn't need it since he doesn't get fatigue from fighting.
|
January 8th, 2010, 01:31 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
0 enc units don't get + to enc from wearing armour for melee, but they do for spellcasting.
|
January 8th, 2010, 04:14 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
of course, the tomb king is going to be casting exactly one spell: divine blessing. 4 fatigue is sort of like 0 fatigue - it shouldn't increase the chances of taking a critical. (You need at least 10 fatigue for fatigue to start to matter for anything iirc).
|
January 8th, 2010, 04:26 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
And if you don't give him a bless he won't even cast that. Maybe Holy Avenger?
|
January 8th, 2010, 05:19 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tacoma WA, USA
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 103
Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
Well, I could see casting divine blessing, holy avenger, and perhaps one of the national spells.
|
January 8th, 2010, 05:36 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
True, Power of the Grave might well be worth it. That's ramping up into marginally dangerous territory.
E4 might well be worth it then, especially since you have only minimal E access otherwise.
Of course, if you don't go E4, Holy Avenger probably isn't worth the extra fatigue and if you don't take a bless at all, you're left with only PotG and low enough fatigue not to need one.
|
January 8th, 2010, 06:21 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tacoma WA, USA
Posts: 1,314
Thanks: 103
Thanked 72 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
Yeah, you want E3 anyways for hammers, and E4 is great for the sauromancers. So its really not a big deal.
|
January 8th, 2010, 07:14 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Bless for LA C'tis?
Since no-one else is willing to answer your simple question, I will.
Units with Encumbrance 0 do not gain additional melee fatigue from wearing Armor, even if they have -6% luck.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vfb For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode