|
|
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2009, 12:03 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 94
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
Quote:
Originally Posted by WraithLord
I 2nd JimMorrison take on the transformation. The MR hit is a death sentence to your mages in and out of battle. There are so many ways to kill a commander that check MR...
I wouldn't do that unless under extreme circumstances.
|
Is that not overstating it just a little?
Sure, there are lots of things that kill low MR units, but targeting the right low MR units is not easy. Obviously you do not want to field the low MR mages against someone using Master Enslave, but other than that dummy targets work quite well.
|
February 22nd, 2009, 12:48 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
I don't recall all the MR check artillery spells cast at me over the years. I don't think its overstating though.
|
February 22nd, 2009, 12:54 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
Does it bug anyone else that Oceania is mispelled in the title of the post?
Ballz? Ballz?
|
February 22nd, 2009, 02:21 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 94
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
Quote:
Originally Posted by WraithLord
I don't recall all the MR check artillery spells cast at me over the years. I don't think its overstating though.
|
There are also plenty of no MR check artillery spells.
I am not trying to argue that low MR is not a handicap, but calling it a death sentence I do think a bit of a stretch. Of course, in a way bringing mages into battle is a death sentence, but that is rather independent of MR.
My point here is that even though a mage with low MR will in all probability die quicker than one with high MR, this does not mean that the former falls dead in the first fight it gets into. And in the fight it falls in, it probably still has time to get a couple of spells up and working.
In the case of Oceania, it is the question of keeping a balance between more durable and more useful mages.
|
February 22nd, 2009, 02:44 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
Well, here's the thing - nobody is arguing that MA Oceana is not crippled on land and that you've got a major uphill fight. The question is, do you 1) not use your national mages at all in combat 2) use them in their magically crippled form with ridiculous upkeep and very limited spells they can cast 3) transform them. To me, clearly #3 is the way to go despite its drawbacks, *particularly* because this also means you'll be fielding *many* more mages.
Look at it this way, when you transform 15 mages you've conceptually just forged a special soul contract which instead of generating demons spits out a capricorn every turn (with the upkeep cost you saved). Looking at it that way you can see why even if you do have a high attrition rate it's better to do it than not just for the upkeep benefit, not even considering the fact that your mages are vastly more powerful on land now. I also think that if you're clever the danger from having a very small MR is more a limitation to where and how you deploy your mages rather than that your mages die left and right. Instead of sneaking around and single handedly clearing PD you've got to keep your mages with a group of otherwise mostly useless animals and crossbreeds, but still a bunch of mages who move at the speed of the slowest dark vine is *much* better than no combat mages at all.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
February 22nd, 2009, 05:21 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
It sounds reasonable but I'd very much like to see how it holds up in a real MP game.
Had I faced MA O. that opted for mass transformation. I'd have probed all the castles with MH. Every castle that didn't have an astral mage or dome would immediately get MH raining down on it. I'd move a host of assassins with heart finder to its castles. I'd cast leprosy on the castles. Hell, I'd open the manual and look for all the MR check spells, attacks and weapons and I'd bring all that I can get to bear.
In battles I'd use any of a host of spells:
paralyze, mind burn, soul slay, enslave mind, master enslave, charm, sleep, nether darts, disintegrate, astral fires, petrify and I'm sure the list is way longer but my memory ain't.
As I see it, this saves gold (which is not even the main resource in late game dominions, which is of course gems) and opens a huge weakness, just waiting to be exploited.
Bottom line, I have a hard time believing this is viable. Some hard MP proof is required IMHO.
|
February 22nd, 2009, 06:10 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
The crux of the problem, is that you need to get to Transformation fairly early, or your economy will stall out. In order to justify the Transformation strat, and to expedite your UW conquest, it's my understanding you buy Capricorns from the get-go, as you can afford them. So in order to justify the bother of Transforming, you are committing yourself to that course of action.
The problem is, in order to even have then around at all, you are pretty reliant on mid-high level Death summons from Conj to protect from Mind Hunts, and to commit them to battle you are relying on Blood summons that you have no initial access to, which then have a collateral reliance on even more mid-high level Death summons.
I can see this working fairly well overall, should you actually drive straight for Well of Misery, and by some miracle get it up and keep it up. Otherwise, your Death summons, which are in fact the linchpin of the entire strategy, can hardly be numerous enough to fill all of the roles that you need them for. Too bad there's no pretender that auto creates Death gems, or that comes with a "Sickle Whose Crop is Pain" as default weapon.
< Heads off to work on a new concept, the "Screw Combat Magic, here comes the Capricorn Thug Squad" concept. > 9E and Shrouds? Hmmmmm. I'm just not sure these guys really can do anything well enough to scare anyone with any skill, after the second year of the game. >.>
|
February 23rd, 2009, 09:29 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceana - OMG, I think I've done it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lingchih
Does it bug anyone else that Oceania is mispelled in the title of the post?
Ballz? Ballz?
|
It bugs me every time when I am reading Abyssia or *hiem or R'yleh or Formoria or Malverni or whatever else some people continue to use. Then again, I have been using Pangea for the longest time, because I somehow wanted to differentiate between the nation and the continent.
Nice illustration of how misspellings can be annoying. Ballz?
|
March 10th, 2009, 07:26 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceania - OMG, I think I've done it
As this oceania guide was able to go over 7 pages, maybe someone might be interested to try it in a real MP environment.
So please join at: Lapis Game
|
March 12th, 2009, 04:58 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In Ulm und um Ulm herum
Posts: 787
Thanks: 133
Thanked 78 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: MA Oceania - OMG, I think I've done it
Hmm, I have given this some thought, and the death/lamia route sounds great but I too can't see how massed transformation will get you anywhere.
I really like transformation but I don't think transforming all of your mages is a viable route.
First thing is transforming 15 mages doesn't give you an extra mage per turn but exactly 15 new mages. With that it's the cheapest summon but it has a hidden cost in mage and castle turns (move out of the water, heal feeblemind, went wrong). If you start loosing lots of the transformed mages it's hardly cheap.
And while transformation can add some new capabilities to your mages if you do it to every mage the enemy will just know what to expect from you and the stats aren't great for all animals. Add low precision (well, eagle eyes gets you to 10 prec that doesn't cut it imho, especially as it would get a capricorn to 18 prec and since you don't have the most spectacular magic you'd have to hit more often than the enemy) hp, and morale as other weaknesses. Why not transform selectively and give some of the capricorns a booster (water bracelet costs the same as transformation, thistle mace costs 4 gems more) so you can have a mixed force?
Some high nature animals to cast battlefield wide spells and buffs. Some boosted capricorns to cast area effect spells and make mindhunts, succubi, archers, fear not certain win counters. I don't know about battlefield mr spells but a capricorn might just fill the role of soul slay bait compared to your low hp animals.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|