|
|
|
|
|
July 14th, 2004, 03:43 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Prince George BC, Canada
Posts: 840
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Question about Allegince Subverters
What is it that an AS targets when attempting to subvert a ship? Is it the Bridge, life support, or crew quarters? If a ship has a Master Computer AND conventional ship control, can it still be subverted? If so, would it have to have a bridge, life support and Crew quarters? Or only whatever it is that an AS targets?
__________________
Nick (bearclaw)
You don't know the Power of the Dark Side. I must obey my Master.
Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis
A+ Se+++ GdY $++ Fr- C+ Csp Sf* AuO M++ MpTFdAM St RTNH Pw++ Fq++ Nd++ Rp++ G++ Mm++ Bb++ L+ Tcp-
|
July 14th, 2004, 04:00 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
AS has no affect on MS's.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
July 14th, 2004, 04:18 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Prince George BC, Canada
Posts: 840
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
Thanks. Found a work-around.
Thanks again.
__________________
Nick (bearclaw)
You don't know the Power of the Dark Side. I must obey my Master.
Potestatem obscuri lateris nescitis
A+ Se+++ GdY $++ Fr- C+ Csp Sf* AuO M++ MpTFdAM St RTNH Pw++ Fq++ Nd++ Rp++ G++ Mm++ Bb++ L+ Tcp-
|
July 14th, 2004, 03:42 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
Quote:
Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
AS has no affect on MS's.
|
Furthermore, AS has no effect on ships with destroyed Master Computer after patch 1.91. Pre patch AS could capture a ship with destroyed Master Computer.
__________________
If you give a man a fish, he will eat a day;
But if you teach a man to fish, he will buy an ugly hat;
And if you talk about a fish to a starving man, then you're a consultant
|
July 14th, 2004, 08:51 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
Was that 1.91?
I thought it changed in an earlier one.
Also, does the AS ability work on Fighters?
|
July 15th, 2004, 03:25 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
If a carrier with fighters on board is converted (as in a WP assault), the fighters are converted too. They then launch.
Otherwise I think not, but check the targeting list for the AS. If it says "Ship" only then they are safe. If "Ship/Fighter/Drone" they can be caught. I don't remember any battles I fought getting fighters converted once launched.
__________________
I thought of the sun as a big bright ball of something that produced an intense absence of darkness. Alan Dean Foster No More Crystal Tears
A++SeGdy$+-++Fr?C++++Cst+SfAi--Mm-MpTS---SsROPw++Fq++Nd++++RpG++Mm++Bb
|
July 15th, 2004, 03:27 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
Quote:
Originally posted by Loser:
Was that 1.91?
I thought it changed in an earlier one.
|
I believe it was 1.84 that this changed in, but either way it is changed and applies to 1.91.
__________________
Ragnarok - Hevordian Story Thread
-------------------
I think...therefore I am confused.
They were armed. With guns, said Omari.
Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?
The dreaded derelict dwelling two ton devil bunny!
Every ship can be a minesweeper... Once
|
July 15th, 2004, 03:49 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,727
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
What I meant to ask was if a weapon with the AS ability could be put on a fighter, would it work?
|
July 16th, 2004, 12:06 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
Indeed, you can mod an Allegiance Subverter as a fighter weapon.
[ July 16, 2004, 11:16: Message edited by: Alneyan ]
|
July 16th, 2004, 07:17 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,547
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Question about Allegince Subverters
Remember that fighter weapons stack, though, so the percentage chance to subvert will be the the damage per subverter times the number of subverters per fighter times the number of fighters in your fighter stack. So a default sized stack of 5 fighters each equipped with 1 AS doing 1 damage would have a 5% chance to subvert, while a stack of 100 of the same type of fighters (say, launched from a planet) would be guaranteed to subvert (assuming the weapon actually hit).
edit: hmm, what else stacks that would be interesting to play around with? Seekers stack, so I guess you could put Crew ConVersion on a seeker, it MIGHT work... Satellite and WP weapons don't stack; with troops it's irrelevant because troops can't be converted... Drones don't stack, but a drone can have multiple warheads and I think those stack... either that or each applies separately, which gives diminishing returns with the probabilities (50% + 50% = 75% if they apply separately, 50% + 50% = 100% if they stack directly) ... Mines, hmm, that would be interesting, mines that steal your crew!
[ July 16, 2004, 18:22: Message edited by: Ed Kolis ]
__________________
The Ed draws near! What dost thou deaux?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|