|
|
|
|
February 4th, 2001, 06:33 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Imbalance: missiles v beams
Hey folks,
I'm loving this game, though I am finding something that makes not love it as much. It seems that missiles are just way too powerful versus beam weapons. I have a game where all of the AI's are using missiles mostly, and I am forced to as well, because even my best Cannons only have a range of 7. Their missiles have huge ranges and huge power.
There are so many different beam weapons that I would like to use (and see used on me), but it seems that you can't get close enough to get in a shot.
Am I off my rocker on this? Can this be changed to balance things out?
DrCheese
|
February 4th, 2001, 06:41 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Garden-Variety State
Posts: 356
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Imbalance: missiles v beams
More point defense and missiles won't be a threat anymore. Fill entire destroyers and light cruisers with PD.
__________________
Hail Caesar!
L+ GdY $? Fr! C- SdS T!+ Sf+ Tcp A% M++ MpM R!- Pw+ Fq-- Nd-- RP+ G++
|
February 4th, 2001, 06:43 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Syracuse,NY USA
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Imbalance: missiles v beams
Put 2 Point defense cannons on each of your ships and see how much better you will do in battle.
|
February 4th, 2001, 07:17 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Imbalance: missiles v beams
Ah, so maybe you don't want to increase seeker speed like I have? If you have point defense, you can blunt the attacks. The increased speed just makes sure they only get one shot before they impact.
------------------
--
"What do -you- want?" "I'd like to live -just- long enough to be there when they cut off your head and stick it on a pike as a warning to the next ten generations that some favors come with too high a price. I would look up into your lifeless eyes and wave like this..." *waggle* "...can you and your associates arrange that for me, Mr. Morden?"
__________________
--
...can you and your associates arrange that for me, Mr. Morden?
|
February 4th, 2001, 07:50 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Imbalance: missiles v beams
doctorcheese wrote:
quote: There are so many different beam weapons that I would like to use (and see used on me), but it seems that you can't get close enough to get in a shot.
Actual, there is only one beam weapon: Phased Polaron Beams (PPBs). These weapons are better than every other beam weapon except a (very) few racial-tech weapons. Research Physics twice and then Phased weapons. Ta-da, you now have the best beam weapon in the game. You should be able to get these by turn 25 or so with most game settings. Enjoy.
__________________
-Zan
|
February 4th, 2001, 07:52 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Imbalance: missiles v beams
Consider using carriers? Missiles can't target fighters...
Do research PD, and use fleets with overlapping fields of PD fire (currently, since the distance function is $L_{\inf}$, I prefer wall -- almost all of my ships will be able to simultaneously commence firing at any given target).
A more long-term goal is to research propulsion and stellar harnessing. Solar Sail III + 6x Quantum Engine --> 12/6 speed, which will match any missile in the unmodified game (only plasma IV/V can go 6, IIRC. And you really don't need QE; the level below it + Sail III gets you 11/6 due to rounding). Then use a variant of the Maximum Range strategy, with "Maximum Range/Don't Get Hurt" as the movement strategies. If you're a Propulsion Expert race, you can even be *faster* than the fastest missiles (13/7 in a BC hull; BB drops you to 12/6, even a DN will be 11/6 -- still as fast as a Plasma IV/V).
------------------
-- The thing that goes bump in the night
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
February 5th, 2001, 01:11 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Imbalance: missiles v beams
As I have mentioned in another thread, I have enabled point defence at game start (but made subsequent researching a bit more expensive). This means that missiles (and fighters) have to be employed in mass to achieve results.
In order to make the AI more challenging, I have altered their DesignCreation files so that they have to include 2 PD per 100kT of ship and have decreased the space requirement for AI PD....
The AI opponents are much tougher to knock over......
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|