|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
November 23rd, 2016, 09:23 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 52
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
BT-7 upgrade
August 1941, Playing as the Soviets in a long campaign. I have 6 BT-7's in my core and although I really like their mobility I think they are rapidly becoming obsolete. Any suggestions on an upgrade? I'm thinking about M3's or T-50's as I'd like to stay with something small and tracked to cause trouble on the flanks or in the enemy rear area.
Of course they only cause trouble until they run into an well hidden 50mm, 75mm or 88mm gun and then I get to watch what's left of the crew sprint towards their rear area...
Thanks in advance!
|
November 24th, 2016, 09:03 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
(Moved to TO&E thread)
I use the T-60 light tank as a light infantry support tank.
- It has a 20mm autocannon, and a decent ammo supply for it
- 20mm autocannon produces HE blast effect in the surrounding hexes (like 75mm guns)
So its an extremely good grunt basher, especially if those grunts are beside other ones!
Otherwise the M3 light has more MG's to produce more HE effect in the target hex, and it has marginally better AT effect.
T-50 has a very good 57mm gun for AT effect, but those things were rarer than hen's teeth.
Bt-7 actually served till the end of the war, in the Far East where they were still capable vs Japanese armour.
If you want anti-infantry effect, then you could change the BT-7 to BT7a artillery tanks, which have 76mm howitzers and a decent number of HE shots.
All of them need to be kept away from enemy ATG and tanks, of course.
Last edited by Mobhack; November 24th, 2016 at 08:01 PM..
|
November 24th, 2016, 01:53 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 52
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
Thanks Andy! I'll check out the T-60 and I didn't know that the BT-7 served throughout the war either.
|
November 24th, 2016, 02:56 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
until 12/1945
|
November 30th, 2016, 05:25 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 385
Thanks: 1
Thanked 76 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
From a doctrinal point of view, my understanding is that the Soviet plan was to replace BT "cavalry tanks" with the T-34 tank. Of course by the time Germans started invading there was not enough T-34 tanks produced, and after that the TOEs for armoured units were radically revised several times within a relatively brief period of time.
As for T-50, that was originally designed as a replacement for T-26 infantry tank, but due to manufacturing issues was abandoned in favour of the easier to build (but lightly armed) T-60, which was then replaced by T-70. By which time the Soviets had decided that T-34 (or SU-76) would be a better choice for the infantry support role.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Griefbringer For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 30th, 2016, 12:38 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
The T-50s really only were used against Finland - they captured a few, including up-armoured ones.
|
November 30th, 2016, 06:22 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
Precisely, they fought in Leningrad area, against Finns and Germans. Surprisingly, only one was captured, but it served for a long time (and was repainted several times).
Small numbers of tanks were also used in several other places, most notably Northern Caucasus.
|
December 13th, 2016, 04:14 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 385
Thanks: 1
Thanked 76 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Re: BT-7 upgrade
As for the T-50 captured by the Finnish Army, I think that it may have ended up at some point serving as a command tank for the Finnish "heavy tank company", which contained a motley mixture of captured Soviet tanks.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|