|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
May 17th, 2017, 05:15 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 41
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Anyone seen or heard anything about this
Interesting. I wonder if this will happen or if it could be done any better than it is here?
http://www.slitherine.com/forum/view...?f=454&t=77235
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Nitro Cruiser For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 18th, 2017, 05:53 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yogyakarta, Nusantara
Posts: 468
Thanks: 99
Thanked 104 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
Why? What about it?
It's good! It is good!
Gary Grigsby is the Lord of the best wargames. It's a very good news that now we'll have a tactical wargame from him again after all this time creating operational wargames. And NOT just any tactical wargame, it is actually THE spiritual successor to our most beloved game that is Steel Panthers! It's like we've struck a needle in the haystack!
If I can program in C++ I'd volunteer without pay, just for the honor of working with him and the fun of engineering wargaming ideas.
|
May 18th, 2017, 03:58 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 97
Thanks: 552
Thanked 43 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
Potentially good news, though I wonder if I would still be playing it 20 years after it comes out?
Steve
|
May 18th, 2017, 07:47 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MTY NL MX
Posts: 336
Thanks: 73
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
I read about this somewhere, can't remember the publication. It sounds interesting though. I wonder how different it could possibly be from the one we have today.
__________________
Oveja Negra
|
May 18th, 2017, 09:25 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Thanks: 434
Thanked 275 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steves308
Potentially good news, though I wonder if I would still be playing it 20 years after it comes out?
Steve
|
Touché .
|
May 18th, 2017, 09:41 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 428
Thanked 148 Times in 104 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
A salivating prospect indeed, although with advanced maturity comes the propensity to drool. Anyway sure hope it pans out before I croak!
|
May 19th, 2017, 07:35 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 570
Thanks: 2
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
Hmm I suppose that next SP will be commercial game (not free as WinMBT/WW2/SPWAW)?
|
May 19th, 2017, 10:34 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
Posts: 177
Thanks: 21
Thanked 69 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
"...the spiritual successor to Steel Panthers"
I am troubled by this phrase. They did not use 'updated' or 'modernize' or 'conversion to XXX game engine', many spiritual successors to old classic DOS games were less than stellar.
The primary reason for this effort will not be to make a dedicated group of fans happy. It will be to develop a product that will appeal to a large market share. The feel of an Avalon Hill board game is not an experience bringing back happy memories to a 18-30 year old demographic much less the IGYG game play.
I hope it will not end up a 'World of Tanks' copy and would be surprised if it is just 'Winspww2' with better graphics.
A rotational 3D map would be nice with a 3/4th view option rather than just overhead. A contour line overlay toggle also.
Hopefully it will be easy to mod because I can guarantee that they better have every detail of the weapon/vehicle database correct or there will be "no joy in Mudville".
|
May 19th, 2017, 02:59 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,487
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,690 Times in 2,810 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
Quote:
Originally Posted by jp10
I can guarantee that they better have every detail of the weapon/vehicle database correct or there will be "no joy in Mudville".
|
I can say with some experience that getting "every detail of the weapon/vehicle database correct" to the point someone won't nitpick some detail that doesn't agree with their source is an impossible feat.
My favourite example is and always will be the Tiger tank......you'd think by now that this...one of the most talked and written about tanks arguably ever.......that you would find no deviation in accepted spec but here's two picked at random
note the speed claimed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_I
http://www.worldwar2aces.com/tiger-tank/
Road speed varies by 7.4 km/h 38 km/h vs 45.4 km/h
In this game that would be the difference between 13 and 15
This website
http://www.alanhamby.com/technical.shtml
agrees with wiki
http://www.fprado.com/armorsite/tiger1.htm
says 45 kph
Profile Publications claims max road speed 23 mph and that equals 37.01491 km/h
I rest my case.....
EDIT
and...
http://www.wwiivehicles.com/germany/...heavy-tank.asp
lists all claims.....
Speed - Road 22.9 mph, 23 mph, 23.5 mph, 24 mph
37 kph, 38 kph, 45.4
Last edited by DRG; May 19th, 2017 at 03:11 PM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 19th, 2017, 08:10 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: Anyone seen or heard anything about this
I cannot see it having anywhere near the amount of units this game has, nobody would be that mad nowadays to attempt something like that. If they take the data from the original games without further research things wont be correct.
Spiritual successor so new incarnation & based on which version of SP?
Has the potential to be great starting from scratch many things you could do differently or add. Take ATGs units could have 2 states limbered & unlimbered or add turret speeds to help differentiate tanks SPGs, attacking a Tiger from all angles now becomes a bit easier. Simple things like HEAT using a different accuracy model to AP or vehicles using some MP to accelerate from stationary. Global visibility reworked to allow star shells & gun flashes etc.
Could be great I would guess adding or improving game mechanics is the easy part, building an AI that can use them not so much.
__________________
John
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|