|
|
|
|
September 27th, 2003, 11:08 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
New Shrapnel look
What do you think of it? (Trying not to bias the poll, so no comment from me here..)
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
September 28th, 2003, 12:41 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Lancaster, OH 43130
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 5
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
Also it will fit in with the new site design that we will be premiering soon .
__________________
Change is inevitable, how you handle change is controllable - J. Strong
|
September 28th, 2003, 01:02 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gettysburg Sector
Posts: 785
Thanks: 7
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
I really like it, the forum looks really professional and upstanding. My only suggestion would be to replace the tacks that mark new Posts or not.
I'm certain there is something more in line with theme that can be used that'll really help state the professional military look and feel of shrapnel.
|
September 28th, 2003, 10:02 AM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mictlan
Posts: 1,767
Thanks: 12
Thanked 165 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
I like the new look too. But I think the old read/unread tickers were better.
|
September 28th, 2003, 02:50 PM
|
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Lancaster, OH 43130
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 5
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
Actually I like these better, they stand out more. Easier for me to keep track of the Boards .
__________________
Change is inevitable, how you handle change is controllable - J. Strong
|
September 29th, 2003, 11:09 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
From other thread:
Quote:
Originally posted by Klvino:
I like the new colors, but I would suggest ditching the copper tone in the Posts (the second alternating color I'm guessing based on it's appearance)
It doesn't fit the muted WW2 Army motif of everything else.
|
I would second that. The copperish color is what I do not like... it doesn't look good with the rest of the color scheme (the greys and reds) IMO.
[ September 29, 2003, 22:09: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
October 1st, 2003, 08:59 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
New to the forums, so I can't really comment on that, but the new overhaul to the site design is a huge improvement. Whoever is behind it deserves serious kudos.
__________________
"Is like worst song, played on ugliest guitar."
-Vlad from Achewood
|
October 1st, 2003, 10:01 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
You can certainly comment on anything you want. Being new to the forums does not matter.
|
October 4th, 2003, 09:49 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Shrapnel look
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
You can certainly comment on anything you want. Being new to the forums does not matter.
|
What I meant by that was that I haven't been around the forums in so long that I'd forgotten what they looked like before, so I'm not really qualified to give an opinion on whether or not the new forum look is an improvement over the old.
__________________
"Is like worst song, played on ugliest guitar."
-Vlad from Achewood
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|