|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
April 28th, 2020, 04:50 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 22
Thanks: 16
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
obat11 Russia
I'm unable to fit the HMG platoon into any of the assigned vehicles (formations 509, 510, 511). I've got the same issue with MMG formations 67 and 503 when selecting BTR-82(A).
Unit 872 with NSV should be named MT-LBVM, "V" is just for wide tracks. Source: https://medium.com/@Monk_of_War/the-...d-63fe4fa13023
RPG-22 (weapon 26) should be named "Netto".
|
April 28th, 2020, 05:08 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
Will investigate. Those formations have been like that at least a decade....... Ahh.... I see now the teams were originally 3 men and are now 4....looks like 3-4 years ago but no time to dig further ATM
Last edited by DRG; April 28th, 2020 at 05:16 PM..
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 30th, 2020, 09:52 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
The full solution will have to wait for whenever we update the game again but if you do not PBEM and don't think you ever will you can easily fix this exactly the way I fixed it
First off this little "problem" goes back to a change made in 2012 so obviously few people use those armoured HMG formations otherwise we would have heard about this sooner
The armoured HMG formations are stand-alone's so they are not used as part of a larger formation so fixing is simple
In the master OOB they now look like this......
509 HMG Sec /APC
510 HMG Sec /BMP
511 HMG Sec /Lt APC
so they are "sections" not platoons and you create that by removing the template transport vehicle from the fourth slot and put it in the third slot leaving you with 2 HMG teams per vehicle instead of 3 then you change Plt to Sec for the formation name and the "problem" goes away
Then change BTR-82's from 108 carry to 109 carry.....that *may* be incorrect to some but it's what works.....it's a game not reality and we cannot break up units like can be done in reality so sometimes we have to bend reality and that is what it takes to make MG Pl /APC work using the BTR-82's
The other two name adjustments have been made as well
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 1st, 2021, 12:11 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 101
Thanked 619 Times in 410 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
While researching the immediate post-war Soviet Airborne Units, I discovered the detailed conversions of the Tu-4 bomber into airborne transports.
They developed the Tu-4D and associated "cabins" (giant drop tanks), and Factory no.23 converted 100 to 300 (sources differ) Tu-4 into this configuration starting 1955.
early test of a P-90 cockpit with ZIS-2 cannon
When equipped with two loaded cabins, each with either a SD-44 self propelled gun, or a ASU-57, the Tu-4D had a 800~ km (500 mile) radius of action.
Apparently the system was only in service for a very short period of time -- 1956 to about 1958 -- because at this point the turboprop powered An-8 and An-12 arrived with "roll off" cargo doors.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MarkSheppard For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 1st, 2021, 04:30 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
It's interesting, but all things considered, I think I will give adding it to the OOB a pass
|
January 1st, 2021, 04:33 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 101
Thanked 619 Times in 410 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
Understandable, since there are so few free slots now, and Russia's notorious for adding new "improved" equipment into service at a rapid clip.
|
April 18th, 2021, 10:25 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Portugal
Posts: 107
Thanks: 9
Thanked 36 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RC4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 18th, 2021, 06:40 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
Quote:
Originally Posted by RC4
A good information site with many TO&E and info
|
VERY useful and apparently up-to-date.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
June 30th, 2021, 07:10 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pila, North west Poland
Posts: 636
Thanks: 377
Thanked 241 Times in 166 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
Great photo of soviet recruits training with RPG-7 late sixties/ early seventies
|
December 12th, 2021, 04:11 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: obat11 Russia
409 Igla-1 SAM - weapon #143 9M313 Igla-1 has the same accuracy 118 as later #132 9M39 Igla, while Igla-1 was a transitional simpler first version, so it should be somewhere between #131 9M36 Strela-3 (80) and Igla.
412 Igla SAM, 770, 771 Igla-S SAM - the photo is old Strela-2 - photo 45374 of Igla-1 or 13352 of Verba is better option.
Or there is Igla: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1a/0f...a99bc0ed33.jpg
BTW, here is Verba with IFF 1L229V module https://www.kbm.ru/local/images/kbm/...1469427260.jpg
351 Mi-6 - according to Russian sources, only part of helicopters were armed, but it was only one MG.
352, 353 Mi-26 - there aren't known armed Mi-26
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Pibwl For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|