|
|
|
 |

July 19th, 2003, 06:09 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question: Laying mines on top of a enemies planet
Oh, that's good to know!
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|

July 19th, 2003, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question: Laying mines on top of a enemies planet
Quote:
Originally posted by jimbob:
Second question (sorry this is sats). If you launch all 100 satelites in one shot, will you get just one stack? Or does this only depend upon the number of types of satelites? Will a single stack fire everything at one ship, or will they fire at another ship assuming ship #1 is destroyed? I'm thinking I should build more sat types, but am unsure...
|
Satellites in a sector will always be in one stack, but the sats will fire individually. Having multiple designs is a good thing. You can give them different strategies so they can fire at different targets. As well, offensive and defensive bonuses from one satellite apply to all satellites in the stack.
New question: If you try to lay mines in a sector with enemy mines present, will you still be able to lay your mines or will your ship and cargo be destroyed first?
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|

July 19th, 2003, 09:23 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question: Laying mines on top of a enemies planet
Quote:
As well, offensive and defensive bonuses from one satellite apply to all satellites in the stack.
|
You mean that I only need one sensor component on one of the satelites, and they will all have that level of sensors!!?? Likewise ECM, etc? That's a little excessive if true, isn't it?
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|

July 19th, 2003, 10:48 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brazil
Posts: 827
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question: Laying mines on top of a enemies planet
Think about what happens when you add a satellite with a Talisman to the stack.
__________________
Have you ever had... the sudden feeling... that God is out to GET YOU?
Well, my girl dumped me and I'm stuck with the raftmates from Hell in the middle of the sea and... what was the question again???
|

July 19th, 2003, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Question: Laying mines on top of a enemies planet
Quote:
Originally posted by jimbob:
You mean that I only need one sensor component on one of the satelites, and they will all have that level of sensors!!?? Likewise ECM, etc? That's a little excessive if true, isn't it?
|
Exactly right, Jimbob. It does seem excessive, but it helps to balance out their immobility and singular location. This blanket coverage also applies to scattering and, more importantly, stealth armor, since the stealth factor cannot be turned off! A ship or fleet without appropriate sensors will fly right by without engaging in combat. You need an uncloaked ship or another type of unit in the sector as well to "expose" your powerful sat group.
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|