Strategy guide?

[henk brouwer]

quote:

---

Originally posted by ColdSteel:
If the squirrel is made of anti-matter then all it would have to do is grab a normal everyday squirrel for a little tussle and *baboom*, instant conVersion of mass to energy. Matter/anti-matter reactions are very good at making the conVersion. Of course, it would react with the atmosphere's positive particles first but that just ruins a good story.

That squirrel would not perish alone.

---

AND both the matter and the antimatter squirrel would be converted into energy, so we'll have an explosion twice the size.

That's a lot of energy, we need an anti-matter squirrel device mod for se4... you'll be quite invincible with one of those...

[a philistine]

quote:

---

Originally posted by raynor:
{snip}

BTW, what really is the full form of the equation E = M * C^2? I remember memorizing it for my third semester of college physics of the atom. But that has been so long ago. I'd really like for someone to post the full equation with explanation.

---

Total energy = m*c^2/(1-v^2/c^2)^.5

This equals the energy in the rest mass along with the (relatavistic) kinetic energy.

BTW, the initial calculation on the energy equivalent of a 1 KG squirrel (pretty fat squirrel..) is a bit off. 1 megaton = 4.2 x 10^15 Joules, thus the energy equivalent of 1 KG squirrel (two .5 KG squirrels for you purists) is about 21 megatons. (9 x 10^16 J/4.2 x 10^15 J/MT = 21.42 MT).

--A Philistine

[Alpha Kodiak]

If you could use a linear accelerator to fire a normal matter squirrel into an anti-matter squirrel at .99C, would you get an additional kinetic energy component to the explosion? What are the relativistic effects of a near-light-speed squirrel, anyway?

[Suicide Junkie]

All you'd get is the Energy from their mass (1.9x 10^17 J) plus their kinetic energy (quite a bit in this case).

[a philistine]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Alpha Kodiak:
If you could use a linear accelerator to fire a normal matter squirrel into an anti-matter squirrel at .99C, would you get an additional kinetic energy component to the explosion? What are the relativistic effects of a near-light-speed squirrel, anyway?

---

Well, (from the reference frame of the shooter) he'd be about 7 times as heavy, about 7 times shorter (in the axis of his travel) and he'd impact a stationary object with a kinetic energy equal to 130 megatons (assuming the rather well-fed, 1 KG squirrel)--about six times the energy that would be gained by converting the squirrel's mass to energy.

Just as an aside, the kinetic energy of an object is equal to the "conVersion" energy of the mass of an object at about .87c.

Load up your squirrels...

--A Philistine

(EDIT--fixed a math error in the KE=ConVersion calc. )

[This message has been edited by a philistine (edited 01 March 2001).]

[dmm]

So, you DON'T need an antimatter squirrel to get a huge bLast. Just get it going at a good fraction of the speed of light. Try 0.999c for starters. (Kids, don't try this at home. You might blow up the Earth.)

Also, I am shocked, SHOCKED, that no one has pointed out the inhumane nature of these experiments in regard to the effects on the squirrel.

[dmm]

On topic:
Use overwhelming force. Concentrate your fire.