.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Air Assault Task Force- Save $8.00
Bronze- Save $10.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th, 2001, 06:39 PM

TaeraRepublic TaeraRepublic is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Beer-Sheva, Israel
Posts: 67
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
TaeraRepublic is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

Ohwell, posted twice...

Anyway,
About the racestyle, i spent hours working on politic and anger files...

------------------
Emperor Klis't of the Taera Republic.
Proud member of the League of Empires.

E-Mail -
Ora Planet - Taera Republic - League of Empires

[This message has been edited by TaeraRepublic (edited 10 April 2001).]
__________________
[i] Emperor Klis't of the Taera Republic.
Proud member of the League of Empires.</I]
E-Mail -
Ora Planet - Taera Republic - League of Empires
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 10th, 2001, 08:35 PM
Q's Avatar

Q Q is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Q is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

I agree that at the moment it is not very attractive to build larger mines (I never do!). The idea of counting the larger mines as three units for the minesweeping would be one possibility. Or if you would restrict the ability to sweep larger mines to sweeping components of higher tech levels? Or a combination of both: Large mines cannot be sweept by sweeping components level I and II, level III will sweep one large mine, level IV two and level V three. For small mines everything remains as it is and for medium mines it is in between.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 10th, 2001, 09:31 PM
Suicide Junkie's Avatar
Suicide Junkie Suicide Junkie is offline
Shrapnel Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Suicide Junkie is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

I think that having larger mines have more hitpoints against minesweepers is a good idea.

Say 10, 15, 20 HP for the mines,
and a minesweeper does 10 damage per hit.
(MS V gets five shots.)
Then, large mines are harder to kill, but not too much more.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 10th, 2001, 09:39 PM

Nitram Draw Nitram Draw is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nitram Draw is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

The way I thought mine worked was each mine attacked a ship and if , after taking the armor into effect, the ship was destroyed then the next mine attacked the next ship. If the first mine did not kill the ship, all damage was considered repaired and the next mine attacked the ship and so on. Is this correct?
If it is then there is a good reason to build large mines, as they can do more damage. If not then large mines don't appear to be very useful. I have only used small mines so I don't know how it works exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 10th, 2001, 09:44 PM

rdouglass rdouglass is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Biddeford, ME, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rdouglass is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

Also, take into account that Organic Armor III can basically ignore all mines except Large Mine w/ 2 Warhead III's. It has been stated in other threads, so check 'em out. Organic tech is pretty powerful as it is - if you only use small mines (per discussion below) you will NOT be effective against Organic tech.

Also IMO, a mine is a mine is a mine.... Sweeper I, sweep 1 mine, Sweeper II sweep 2 mines, etc..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 10th, 2001, 10:49 PM

AJC AJC is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: West Coast - USA
Posts: 417
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
AJC is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

I dont think the large mines should be considered three mines.

the game allows for 5000 units.

[This message has been edited by AJC (edited 10 April 2001).]
__________________
--
AJC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old April 10th, 2001, 11:30 PM

Aussie Gamer Aussie Gamer is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 215
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aussie Gamer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Should large mines be counted as three mines for sweepers?

I say increase the limit of units in space and leave the mines alone.

If you shoot a explosive device, no matter it's size, you basically stuff it. It would be disabled or destroyed by the gun shoot.

So one mine per sweeper gun is realistic.

If you want to protect the large mines then either mix in unarmed small mines, cheapness!, or design a dummy mine which is very cheap and weighs only 1kt. This would add more realism than changing the sweep/ mine ratio.
Why don't you also have a high level mine head which skips armour!!!! So much for high level organic armour <insert evil laugh!>

[This message has been edited by Aussie Gamer (edited 10 April 2001).]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.