Clams overpowered?

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Yossar:
Hmm, reading the forums, you'd think clams were the biggest problem in the game. Yet, make a poll and the majority of people think they are fine. Odd.

Well, that shouldn't be a surprise. You don't to whine about it if you think there's nothing that's really wrong, it's only the people who want to scream for nerfs that have to cry loudly. This ultimately is what ruins games: The loudest whiners are the ones who get listened to. Just look at the ongoing pattern of nerfings in Blizzard games: It's all because of the developers listening to people who whine too much.

[Graeme Dice]

Originally posted by Norfleet:
Well, that shouldn't be a surprise. You don't to whine about it if you think there's nothing that's really wrong, it's only the people who want to scream for nerfs that have to cry loudly.

Actually, I find that it's the people who are deathly afraid of their favourite overpowered strategies being removed that complain the loudest. After all, you manage to show up in every clam and VQ debate and make vague statements about how it's not really that poweful. If it's not powerful Norfleet, then why do you always use the Vampire Queen, and always build as many clams as possible?

This ultimately is what ruins games: The loudest whiners are the ones who get listened to. Just look at the ongoing pattern of nerfings in Blizzard games: It's all because of the developers listening to people who whine too much.

I wasn't aware that Blizzard games were ruined in any way shape or form by the rebalancing that happens. In fact, they are made better.

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
If it's not powerful Norfleet, then why do you always use the Vampire Queen

Simple: It's the chassis that best suits the strategy I prefer to play. If you want something that you can tweak into one of the best SCs possible, there's really only a few options: Vampire Queen, Allfather, Ghost King, anything with enough innate abilities to build on top of. I haven't ALWAYS used the VQ, only when the nation can spare the points for it. If I wanted to play a bless strategy, the VQ would definitely not be my first choice. It's entirely a stylistic preference: Change it, and I'll still pick the best basic chassis for tweaking into an SC and run with it: I think we can all agree that SOMETHING has to be the best at something, and for tweaking for an SC, few other options can match the VQ.

and always build as many clams as possible?

What else do you do with water gems? Summon Sea Trolls? Don't make me laugh. The underlying problem is that there are very few worthwhile water rituals, and of those there are, most are useful only under very specific conditions which occur infrequently. The fact of the matter is that there is very little you can do with water gems, and clams are a very attractive investment for a long-run thinker like myself: I plan strategies for the long term. Other people prefer to ignore the future and focus on the present. Both are valid approaches.

I wasn't aware that Blizzard games were ruined in any way shape or form by the rebalancing that happens. In fact, they are made better.

That's your opinion. I, for one, do not think that change just for the sake of change is a good thing. Often times I see Blizzard go about nerfing things that weren't in any way unbalanced or even popularly USED because they were weak....and yet they were nerfed anyway. It's clear that they like to mess with things sometimes just because it's amusing to screw with people's heads.

[ April 16, 2004, 02:09: Message edited by: Norfleet ]

[Graeme Dice]

Originally posted by Norfleet:
It's the chassis that best suits the strategy I prefer to play.

Which is to create a pretender that is immune to all elemental damage, all but invulnerable to magic resist spells, totally safe since she can never be forced out of her dominion, and capable of destroying any army that doesn't have an enormous number of death mages with it.

If you want something that you can tweak into one of the best SCs possible, there's really only a few options: Vampire Queen

Which is obviously the best choice.

Allfather,

Vanheim only, still has to worry about afflictions, and isn't immortal.

Ghost King

Also gets afflictions and isn't immortal.

If I wanted to play a bless strategy, the VQ would definitely not be my first choice.

I'm still waiting for your bless effect based army that can beat your tweaked out VQ.

I think we can all agree that SOMETHING has to be the best at something, and for tweaking for an SC, few other options can match the VQ.

Which is obviously the problem, since she's immortal and thereby essentially immune to afflictions and death.

What else do you do with water gems? Summon Sea Trolls? Don't make me laugh. The underlying problem is that there are very few worthwhile water rituals, and of those there are, most are useful only under very specific conditions which occur infrequently.

You've just stated that the imbalance exists, so I hardly see why you are arguing that it doesn't.

That's your opinion. I, for one, do not think that change just for the sake of change is a good thing.

Which is also just your opinion. Opinions are like *******s, everybody has one.

[Zapmeister]

Simple: It's the chassis that best suits the strategy I prefer to play.

Actually I think it's more likely that, like many others, you've decided that it's the chassis that best suits winning the game, and you prefer to win.

Discussions about balance issues are not "whining" - they are undertaken in an attempt to improve the game. If (and I concede this is an overstatement) strategy in Dom2 amounts to little more than choosing the VQ and hoarding clams, then clearly it will become a more complex and interesting game if those imbalances are corrected.

The impression I get is that Illwinter concedes that Dom2 is not as well balanced as it could be, and encourages these discussions. From time to time, they act on our advice and very few people dispute that the game is better for that.

[Catquiet]

Originally posted by Yossar:
Hmm, reading the forums, you'd think clams were the biggest problem in the game. Yet, make a poll and the majority of people think they are fine. Odd.

Clams are fine in a reasonably short game, but as a game drags on clams will represent a larger and larger percentage of total gem income.

If a nation tries to grow more powerful by aquiring provinces for gold and gem income, they have to compete with all the other nations for a finite resource.

If a nation tries to grow more powerful by making clams, all they have to do is invest their gems and wait. The gem income from clams has no upper limit and is a lot less vulnerable than income from provinces.

Growing steadily more powerful without having to fight for it doesn't seem to fit in with the spirit of the game.

[Norfleet]

Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
Which is to create a pretender that is immune to all elemental damage, all but invulnerable to magic resist spells, totally safe since she can never be forced out of her dominion, and capable of destroying any army that doesn't have an enormous number of death mages with it.

In other words, something that will drive off the casual invader who hasn't thought his moves out. What the hell are you doing in my dominion anyway? When you fight a tweaked SC on its home turf, it's SUPPOSED to be uphill.

I'm still waiting for your bless effect based army that can beat your tweaked out VQ.

Actually, we were just kicking this around the other night, and the best shot we've found at taking out a VQ conventionally is a Fire-9 bless on Valkyries backed by Dwarves. Fire-9 on flying units will give you the punch needed to take down an VQ, preferrably before it can raise shields, and Petrify will autoparalyze anything it hits to give you that extra time you need. VQs aren't really that tough if you can nail them before they raise their shields: If a VQ has to start towing around chaff, it'll give up much of the benefits it gained. Plenty of other options exist for targetting an SC's weaknesses.

quote:

---

I think we can all agree that SOMETHING has to be the best at something, and for tweaking for an SC, few other options can match the VQ.

Which is obviously the problem, since she's immortal and thereby essentially immune to afflictions and death.

---

You see this as a problem, I see this as a fact of life that SOMETHING will ultimately climb to the top of the heap as the most potent chassis to build on. It's not as if planning around affliction removal is some sort of onerous chore, either. If affliction removal is such an immense problem for you, you haven't planned out an SC core strategy in sufficient depth. If an SC is merely an adjunct to another strategy, then yes, afflictions will eventually cripple you. If your strategy *IS* that SC, afflictions are a nonissue: You will target yourself at their removal. Considering how often I'm the first to GoH anyway, you can clearly see that I've planned this in advance.

You've just stated that the imbalance exists, so I hardly see why you are arguing that it doesn't.

I don't see how this is an imbalance against clams, more that water magic could use some better spell options. Clams are a long-run investment that don't truly pay off until the late game. I see no reason why people should be forbidden from aiming at a late-game strategy. I have no objections to seeing clams increased in cost to something like 20W or 10W/5N, but I also do not see them as a serious problem.

Which is also just your opinion. Opinions are like *******s, everybody has one.

And they all stink. Let me point out that I wasn't the first to air mine out, though. I do, however, feel that it's worth making a counterpoint, lest the only people with something to say be exclusively the whiners.