|
|
|
 |

May 17th, 2004, 10:20 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 155
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
But the Disease affliction also has more effects than just the not healing and lose 1-hp part. That is, diseased units will continue to accumulate other afflications. So very soon, your army of vamps will be crippled, blind, and useless regardless of its etheral, low-encumberance, and flying abilities.
-Gateway103
|

May 17th, 2004, 10:29 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
Quote:
Originally posted by Zapmeister:
EDIT: Come to think of it, the exact Disease effect, including the loss of 1 HP per turn, would be even more thematic. Vampires are then compelled to feed occasionally, or they will die.
|
This would not work, as regeneration causes you to heal at the end of a turn regardless of your disease status.
|

May 17th, 2004, 10:30 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
I don't think Vampires actually die from not having enough blood to drink, they just become increasingly lazy and go to sleep for hundreds of years until somebody disturbs them and becomes a snack.
|

May 18th, 2004, 12:55 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
So disease and recuperation and life drain, but not regeneration, and encumbrance = 1, would do the trick?
What happens when someone with immortality dies of disease in their own dominion?
PvK
|

May 18th, 2004, 05:34 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
Disease doesn't affect any undead, though, as it stands now. That is, it shows up but they don't lose hp from it. If you changed that general rule, it would have other effects (like restricting C'tis Miasma's choice of viable pretenders).
- Kel
|

May 18th, 2004, 06:40 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
Quote:
Originally posted by Norfleet:
I don't think Vampires actually die from not having enough blood to drink, they just become increasingly lazy and go to sleep for hundreds of years until somebody disturbs them and becomes a snack.
|
Most of vampire literature stays that Vampire must drink blood regularly to maintain their semi-life or they grow increasengly weak and eventually die while suffering terribly from hunger.
|

May 18th, 2004, 07:47 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is the REAL problem with VQs...Norfleet?
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
So disease and recuperation and life drain, but not regeneration, and encumbrance = 1, would do the trick?
|
Recuperation instead of regeneration makes a lot of sense to me, thematically. Keeping life drain and substituting recuperation for regeneration models how I think of the way vamps are supposed to work, but other's mileage may vary.
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|