Gamey Tactics and Bug Exploits Thread

[Alneyan]

Methinks there is no contradiction between those two posts: Fyron does not wish posts saying that "entry 748 isn't gamey", but he is always open to suggestions for further entries.

So, posts shouldn't discuss already existing entries, but they should add new items not currently on the list.

*Gets out of the Ramming Geo's way*

[geoschmo]

Alneyan said:
Methinks there is no contradiction between those two posts: Fyron does not wish posts saying that "entry 748 isn't gamey", but he is always open to suggestions for further entries.

So, posts shouldn't discuss already existing entries, but they should add new items not currently on the list.

Execpt that he did make a statement of judgement saying a particular post was "Sneaky" instead of Gamey, in direct contradiction to what he had previously requested.

[inigma]

29. Any form of using black holes as an offensive weapon extensively, especially when used in systems not originally your own before hostilities broke out.

Ecologically unsound, and environmentally destructive, blackhole-filled galaxies are not much fun to play in, and such a tactic denies any future rebuilding effort should peace be made again, except for the expensive and time-consuming investment of using black hole neutralizers, star creators, and then building ring/sphere worlds in the empty systems.

Star destroyers should be the limit in offensive Stellar Manipulation weapon use, as at least with a destroyed star, planets can be made out of the asteroids again during peacetime.

[Emperor's Child]

29. Mining ally worlds without their knowledge in advance of hostilities.

[Captain Kwok]

I also maintain a response to the original gamey tactics thread at my site:
http://www.captainkwok.net/articles.php