|
|
|
 |

July 4th, 2007, 03:26 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 234
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
LOL, vfb
|

July 4th, 2007, 11:53 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
Yes, vbf is a Pact breaker.
So sad. He burned his Dom III reputation for a few turns of advantage rather than just declare the pact null and wait the agreed upon three turns to attack.
|

July 5th, 2007, 12:38 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland, OR USA
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
Wow. That's the first time I've seen someone break a pact. But at least he role played it slightly. I'll definitely remember, should we be in the same game, not to bother making 'deals' with him though. heh
|

July 5th, 2007, 01:54 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
Didn't you get the memo? It's a Global Emergency! Bandar has ginormous armies, and 4 globals up, some of which indicate research level 8. Whereas Eriu has pissed away our power by squabbling with our neighbors, building fortresses in the wrong places, and generally getting ourselves killed.
The only chance Eriu had to have any impact on the situation at all was a dastardly, sneaky, underhanded, sneak attack. So, that's what we did.
We are already paying the price, as a squad of flying monkeys has kidnapped our prophet!
ooc: Yes, tromper and K, if you do choose to play in MP with me again, and it's the same situation where I am vastly underpowered compared to your nation, I'll be quite likely to do something similar even if we do have a NAP. I won't hold it against you if you'd prefer we did not play in the same games, if you only enjoy playing against people who respect their NAPs. But K, I can't see how you won't get great pleasure out of Bandar Log crushing Eriu for our wickedness!
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

July 5th, 2007, 09:13 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 559
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Methinks some people take this game TOO seriously. Sneak attacks are part of the role playing portion of the game. Like car bombs, they are the tool of an overmatched nation.
BTW....Nice battle, wkd thots. The growing fury kept me in the game for a lot longer than I should have, but it also cost me a whole buncha troops. I thought I was going to win that one hands down, but your falling fires and and elementals kept you in the castle. Good Job!!
Ready for round two??
|

July 5th, 2007, 09:22 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
I watched that fight.
Very impressive. I'm not sure whether the growing fury helped you or hurt you. It kept you going, but you lost a lot of troops once the battle was lost, without doing much real damage. A few berserk mages, too.
An ethereal, lucky crusher is really hard to take down.
My scout has got his popcorn and is ready for round two.
|

July 5th, 2007, 09:54 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 559
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Sneak Attack!
thejeff, I agree, the growing fury in this case was more of a hindrance. However, I have seen a lot of battles where low morale troops could have and would have won had they not run away. I have seen my own battles, in one case, where I had ONE more unit to kill, plus a mediocre mage and had 10 or twelve of my guys route at that point. To be honest, I thought I had that battle won, but Pangaea proved to be too strong.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|