|
|
|
 |
|

February 8th, 2008, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Is there any interest in a pikemen + animalawe mod?
It would require 2 components:
1) Cavalry would need to be quite a bit cheaper, to the point that they were pretty well the preferred melle units.
2) All Cavalry are "animals", and units armed with spears, pikes, etc. get some degree of animal awe.
This would kinda screw over the various monkey nations, since I don't think their special rules could be restored (reincarnation, for example) if you stripped off animal.
The effect would (ideally) be:
swordsmen beat pikemen beat cavalry beat swordsmen
Which is not quite the desired:
Light cavalry beat heavy infantry beat heavy cavalry beat light infantry beat light cavalry
But would come close.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|

February 8th, 2008, 05:48 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
That has been discussed since dom2, there are number of issues like (like the monkey one), still, it could be worth testing.
|

February 9th, 2008, 05:32 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 867
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Quote:
This would kinda screw over the various monkey nations, since I don't think their special rules could be restored (reincarnation, for example) if you stripped off animal.
|
Why do you need to strip the animal from monkeys? Link animal to mounted instead.
|

February 9th, 2008, 06:26 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Monkeys such as all of Bandar Log's troops. Vanara, Bandar etc have animal tag, which would really limit the usefulness of their troops against anyone with pikes.
|

February 9th, 2008, 07:37 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 867
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
I see what you mean. With their low moral they won't be able to hit anything. But I dont see it as such a problem. The pikes will still be vulnerable to missiles. Giving them animalawe will create a niche for them, one they dont have now.
|

February 9th, 2008, 11:39 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Ulmish pikeneers have a bit better morale. I've used them because of that, but I'm not sure if it's worth it at just 11 mor vs 10.
|

February 9th, 2008, 11:46 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 867
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Sorry, I meant the low moral of the monkeys will not allow them to hit pikemen with animalawe.
|

February 9th, 2008, 12:31 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Quote:
Amos said:
Sorry, I meant the low moral of the monkeys will not allow them to hit pikemen with animalawe.
|
I meant that pikeneers could have a niche besides animalawe.  Sorry about that.
|

February 9th, 2008, 12:37 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: guess - and you'll be wrong
Posts: 834
Thanks: 33
Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
Quote:
DrPraetorious said:
The effect would (ideally) be:
swordsmen beat pikemen beat cavalry beat swordsmen
|
This is a really neat idea, but probably not workable via animalawe.
I propose an alternate solution: give heavy cavalry trample, and pikemen size 3.
Since trample only works against smaller units, sz-2 cavalry can smush sz-2 swordsmen, but not sz-3 pikemen, whose repelling long weapons will make them a cost effective counter against trampling heavy cav.
Thoughts?
|

February 9th, 2008, 12:57 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Conceptual Balance Mod 1.2
So the phalanx becomes resistant to cavalry because of its loose formation  ?
That's worth trying (remember to make the pikemen resource size 2 and to lower their food consumption by 1 unit) but has a lot of other clumsy effects.
The ideal solution would be to give pikes and some other weapons an anti-cavalry identifier with the following game mechanics:
* Ignores the defense bonus for mounted units.
* Repel attacks against mounted units inflict full damage, *and* gain a charge bonus to damage based on the attacking mounted unit's AP.
That'd give the heavy cavalry serious second thoughts about charging a pike square, and would also encourage tight formations of pike squares (for more attacks.)
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|