|
|
|
|
April 10th, 2008, 12:56 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Starving???
In the Priori game, I have an underwater castle (I am R'lyeh) that was sieged last turn by Oceania. They left this turn to take another province, but the in-game report says I am still under siege, and starving.
The fort is not under siege anymore. In fact, I rebuilt PD, and bought a commander. But when I click on my troops in there, they have the starving icon. I show over 400 supplies in there now, with only 39 supply usage.
Why are they still starving? Hell, there is a full banquet table set up for anyone that wants to eat.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
April 10th, 2008, 01:20 AM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
I don't have my manual handy, but most likely starvation is checked before movement.
|
April 10th, 2008, 01:29 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
You are probably right, QM.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
April 10th, 2008, 10:16 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
That can't be it. Movement is steps 12-13; starvation is step 22.
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|
April 10th, 2008, 03:16 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 463
Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
Indeed that can't be the case or one would always starve for 2 turns. Plus you would not starve the turn someone moves in and deprives you of supplies which I know one does.
Sadly I can only tell you that it isn't that and not what it is!
|
April 10th, 2008, 03:32 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
When the attacking force leaves the fort (without you taking the castle back by force) it's still reported as sieged even if there is no one there. It's easy to reproduce. It works as if the attacker was sieging with 0 units until the turn is over.
You also get a message from the attacking side that you don't breach the wall anymore.
I don't know if that's intended or not, though.
__________________
Often I must speak other than I think. That is called diplomacy.
* Stilgar
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you a cover up. Real boats rock.
* Darwi Odrade
|
April 10th, 2008, 03:56 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
If there are 0 units sieging defender gets the province back.
|
April 10th, 2008, 04:40 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
Quote:
kasnavada said:
When the attacking force leaves the fort (without you taking the castle back by force) it's still reported as sieged even if there is no one there. It's easy to reproduce. It works as if the attacker was sieging with 0 units until the turn is over.
You also get a message from the attacking side that you don't breach the wall anymore.
I don't know if that's intended or not, though.
|
This seems like a bug to me then. Those expensive units (crabs) will be getting diseased and wounded with over 350 supply available to feed them.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
April 10th, 2008, 09:13 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
Quote:
Lingchih said:
Quote:
kasnavada said:
When the attacking force leaves the fort (without you taking the castle back by force) it's still reported as sieged even if there is no one there. It's easy to reproduce. It works as if the attacker was sieging with 0 units until the turn is over.
You also get a message from the attacking side that you don't breach the wall anymore.
I don't know if that's intended or not, though.
|
This seems like a bug to me then. Those expensive units (crabs) will be getting diseased and wounded with over 350 supply available to feed them.
|
I think there is an unwritten step where it checks if supply comes from the province on the whole or fort supply. So if this happens before movement, when it checks for starvation it looks like they should be starving. Of course this is basically just what kasnavda said (the siege messages are dispatched here too I guess). I doubt it's intended, but probably falls into the large category of 'features'- oddities that are a pain to change and almost pluasable.
|
April 11th, 2008, 06:28 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Starving???
Quote:
the siege messages are dispatched here too I guess
|
Yes, it does.
Well, anyway, the person that did leave should have let one basic infantry or militia alone (without commander), by doing so he sacrifices nothing, but the province is still sieged.
__________________
Often I must speak other than I think. That is called diplomacy.
* Stilgar
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you a cover up. Real boats rock.
* Darwi Odrade
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|