| 
 | 
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
     
    
    
    
 
    
    
 
    
    
 | 
       | 
      
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		  | 
	
	
 
 
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 03:28 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				BANNED USER 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: May 2004 
					
					
					
						Posts: 4,075
					 
					 
	Thanks: 203 
	
		
			
				Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Faithless player:
	
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Let it hereby be known that the ***player*** (name deleted by forum admistrator to comply with rules regarding bating)  cannot be trusted to keep his word,  breaking a NAP +3, one turn in, in the game Tigerstripes.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 03:56 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Sep 2003 
					Location: Eastern Finland 
					
					
						Posts: 7,110
					 
					 
	Thanks: 145 
	
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Faithless player:
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Shouldn't this go to the Tigerstripes thread? 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 04:10 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				BANNED USER 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: May 2004 
					
					
					
						Posts: 4,075
					 
					 
	Thanks: 203 
	
		
			
				Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Faithless player:
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		No more so than the other long thread that detailed the same thing, ie., players that had broken naps. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 04:20 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Sep 2003 
					Location: Eastern Finland 
					
					
						Posts: 7,110
					 
					 
	Thanks: 145 
	
		
			
				Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Faithless player:
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		This one?
I think it became a discussion about should the breakers be announced, and what, exactly, counts as a breach of a NAP. I didn't re-read it all the way, but that's the feeling I get from browsing through it. 
 
Also, this is what KO had to say in that thread:
 
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				Kristoffer O said: 
> To be fair a dominions convention is that NAPs are meant to be inviolable, but many players don't know that yet (it isn't true in a lot of other turn-based games). 
 
Huh? I didn't know that. 
 
I have never played a game of strategy and diplomacy in wich pacts are not expected to be broken. 
 
I'm not very fond of NAP's as it seems people expect anyone who breaks them to be a bastard. I will unvariably attack an opponent when I assume my gains will be the greatest (including diplomatic ones).  
 
There should be no unbreakable pacts, and if players use the term 'NAP' to mean 'a pact that makes you a bastard if you break it' I think the diplomatic traditions of this game has been broken somewhere    
 
It is fun to betray, and it is fun to be betrayed. Frustrating, yes, but all the more fun when you strike back with righteous vengence! Or die trying to   It is also more fun to play when you might expect a backstab from one of your neighbours at any time.  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
Endoperez casts Word Of God! Chrispedersen resists! Chrispedersen is not paralyzed!    
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 04:46 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Nov 2006 
					Location: Oxford, UK 
					
					
						Posts: 5,921
					 
					 
	Thanks: 194 
	
		
			
				Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Faithless player:
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		KO is a smart man. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 04:55 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			
			| 
 
  
			
				
				
				BANNED USER 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Feb 2007 
					
					
					
						Posts: 5,463
					 
					 
	Thanks: 165 
	
		
			
				Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Faithless player:
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		I'm with KO on this one. I've always thought the conventional diplomatic options people have agreed on for dom3 are silly and far too. When I first played mp I had no idea that breaking a treaty (a common diplomatic turn) would be seen by a lot of people as cheating on par with hacking turn files etc. 
 
But that is how a lot of people feel. So generally if you want to play mp dom3 with the shrapnel community, you have to stick to the universal 'NAP3?' that dominates every game as if it was an actual rule. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
		
		
			
			 
			
				June 28th, 2008, 05:27 AM
			
			
			
		  
	 | 
 
	
		
		
		
			  | 
			
 
  
			
				
				
				National Security Advisor 
				
				
				
			 | 
			  | 
			
				
				
					Join Date: Oct 2003 
					Location: Helsinki, Finland 
					
					
						Posts: 5,425
					 
					 
	Thanks: 174 
	
		
			
				Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
			
		
	 
					
					
					
					     
				 
				
			 | 
		 
		 
		
	 | 
 
    
	
     
	
	
		
		
		
			
			
				 
				Re: Faithless player:
			 
             
			
		
		
		
		Right... 
 
Flamebait locked. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
		
			
			
			
			
			
			
			
            
			
			
				
			
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is On 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
     |  
 |