Question about diplomacy

[llamabeast]

I added this to the LlamaServer FAQ text on organising games:

"- Make sure that you state what the game's policy towards treaties and non-aggression pacts is. Should they be inviolable, as many players prefer, or should they be mere words, as in real life? The choice is yours but it's important the players know the ground rules."

I hope people will consider that helpful.

[Ironhawk]

Originally Posted by llamabeast

I added this to the LlamaServer FAQ text on organising games:

"- Make sure that you state what the game's policy towards treaties and non-aggression pacts is. Should they be inviolable, as many players prefer, or should they be mere words, as in real life? The choice is yours but it's important the players know the ground rules."

LLama, "many players" infers a majority. Might be better to restate it as "some players" to be more general.

[Crust]

I'm curious as to how inviolable treaties could be enforced? How could the host or admin or whoever know what actually happened between 2 players?