Quote:
Originally Posted by capnq
Quote:
Originally Posted by licker
I'm thinking that you run the risk of turning players away from certain games by how you define the NAP restrictions up front. Maybe that's the point? But I don't know if you want to create this kind of schism amongst the smallish community.
|
Judging from the poll results, the "schism" is already there. As I see it, the problem is that some people are convinced that there is a "consensus", and react with outrage when their illusions are shattered. |
No one I know believes there is consensus on this issue. No one on the "no break" side has reacted with outrage that people have the ability to break naps.
Quite the contrary - the no break side has been subject to quite a bit of ridicule. "imbecilic, ridiculous, idiotic" - and quite a few more.
I'm not asking the thread be frozen - but I do think if you check back recent threads, that your post is not factually accurate, and I do think more civility is in order on all sides.
Re: Question about diplomacy
Threaded Mode