|
|
|
|
February 21st, 2009, 03:55 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Underwater site searching
The Baalz guides made me take a look at the frequency masks as reported in the 3.17 DB. (Thanks Edi!)
Turns out the most efficient site searching is:
VFB was completely right, I misread the table. So, I removed sites that are alwasy found (lvl 0) and I adjusted % by the number of gems found. So, a site that gives you 2 e is 2x as interesting as one that gives you 1.
n2=22%
w2=22%
d2=15%
e2=9%
s2=9%
a2=6% (never in deep seas iirc)
After that f1,a3, pick you up 2.5%, s3, e3 pick you up 1.3. Rounding due to lvl 0s
So, an N2W2D2E2S2A2 gets you almost everything. A3/F1 depending on design cost.
Now, the fascinating thing is, if you wish to eliminate rares from the equation
W1 - 18.5%
D1- 15.7%
N1 - 15.7%
E2 - 10.5%
W3 - 7.9%
F1 - 7.9%
H1 - 5.26%
w2 - 2.5%
N2 - 2.5%
A1 - 2.5%
E1 - 7.89%
etc.
So all you really need to find more than half of all common sites is
w3D1N1 - Gives you 61%
W3D1N1E2 79%
Adding an F1H1 gets you to 92%.
Last edited by chrispedersen; March 6th, 2009 at 12:57 AM..
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chrispedersen For This Useful Post:
|
|
February 21st, 2009, 12:53 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 239
Thanks: 29
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
very useful thanks
|
February 21st, 2009, 03:38 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
I find it amusing there are so many Astral sites underwater. What about Holy? Was the Ancient Temple of the Deeps the only possible?
What I like most about underwater, is that if you want to manually search, you can focus on N/S/D + Holy, and then just use Tiamat for the rest. Though Voice of Tiamat is a funny spell, it can be the best thing ever, or you can burn all your Water gems, and only get Fire and Earth for your troubles. Oh the fickle sea.
|
February 21st, 2009, 06:21 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
Yeah, I should have looked at holy. Tunnel vision, thinking of mage searching. Out of town - I'll look at it if I can when I get back.
|
February 21st, 2009, 06:54 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
So no Death or Nature sites in the Deep Sea?
For remote site-searching that's useful to know.
|
February 21st, 2009, 07:09 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
No. "Deep Seas" provinces always also have the "Seas" tag. So any site that can be found in a "Sea" can also be found in "Deep Sea". I made the same mistake here originally, but I've fixed it now.
Also, there are no S4 sea or deep sea sites. Chris, what S4 site do you think can exist in seas? Or N3? or F4?
Highest site level in seas from Edi's DB:
Non-unique: E3, A3, W3, S3, F1, H1, N1, D1
Unique: N2, D2
(There are S3/?3 unique deep sea sites, but it's irrelevant, because there is also a non-unique site at the same path level.)
Highest site level in deep seas (including "seas"):
Non-unique: E3, A3, W3, S3, F1, H1, N1, D1
Unique: N2, D2
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
Last edited by vfb; February 21st, 2009 at 07:16 PM..
|
February 22nd, 2009, 12:16 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfb
No. "Deep Seas" provinces always also have the "Seas" tag. So any site that can be found in a "Sea" can also be found in "Deep Sea". I made the same mistake here originally, but I've fixed it now.
Also, there are no S4 sea or deep sea sites. Chris, what S4 site do you think can exist in seas? Or N3? or F4?
Highest site level in seas from Edi's DB:
Non-unique: E3, A3, W3, S3, F1, H1, N1, D1
Unique: N2, D2
(There are S3/?3 unique deep sea sites, but it's irrelevant, because there is also a non-unique site at the same path level.)
Highest site level in deep seas (including "seas"):
Non-unique: E3, A3, W3, S3, F1, H1, N1, D1
Unique: N2, D2
|
I'll get back to you on it vfb; I took the 3.17 db., sorted on terrain; then by gem type; then by lvl. I'll look back into it when I get home. I had forgotten your excellent post.
How did you determine that deep seas also share the seas tag?
If so, this would mean deep sea sites have almost twice the variety of sites possible - and many more uniques.
|
February 22nd, 2009, 04:30 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
If you use the dom map editor, you can't set a province to being deep sea without 'sea' also being automatically selected. This gives a bitmask for the province terrain of 2052: Sea (4) plus Deep Sea (2048).
If you edit a .map file by hand, you could create a province with terrain type 2048. But if you do that, it's not actually underwater, and you get land poptypes in the province. It's called 'Deep Sea' in the game overland map, but you can't move aquatic units into the province.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vfb For This Useful Post:
|
|
March 6th, 2009, 12:38 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
Quote:
Highest site level in seas from Edi's DB:
Non-unique: E3, A3, W3, S3, F1, H1, N1, D1
Unique: N2, D2
(There are S3/?3 unique deep sea sites, but it's irrelevant, because there is also a non-unique site at the same path level.)
Highest site level in deep seas (including "seas"):
Non-unique: E3, A3, W3, S3, F1, H1, N1, D1
Unique: N2, D2
|
Sea Oak is a N2, non-rare.
Last edited by chrispedersen; March 6th, 2009 at 01:02 AM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to chrispedersen For This Useful Post:
|
|
March 6th, 2009, 01:01 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater site searching
Thanks Chris, you're right about Sea Oak, it's N2, non-unique.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|