"A Song of Ice and Fire", veterans-only game, MA. In progress, midgame...

[Dimaz]

Hm, but using stealthy vans is my only chance in the upcoming war. I hope you understand that I have to put some of them in the position before war starts to make a decent surprise attack. He clearly wasn't supposed to be found that early, and I switched him to hide instead of siege immediately after I saw the turn. Of course you have the right to do anything you want on your own territory, including massive MH.
I regret the damage caused by him, but still I think my actions were within the agreement. If you feel otherwise, I'm ready to give the compensation.

[Corwin]

Originally Posted by Dimaz

Hm, but using stealthy vans is my only chance in the upcoming war. I hope you understand that I have to put some of them in the position before war starts to make a decent surprise attack. He clearly wasn't supposed to be found that early, and I switched him to hide instead of siege immediately after I saw the turn. Of course you have the right to do anything you want on your own territory, including massive MH.
I regret the damage caused by him, but still I think my actions were within the agreement. If you feel otherwise, I'm ready to give the compensation.

Sure, I understand Dimaz. I have no problem with stealth armies in general, my only issue was with not having him scripted on retreat when approaching border castle with strong patrols.

It's not a big deal. I intend to try to mindhunt that van. But if you are attached to him I can let him live, in return for the compensation to cover price of the killed archers and lost one turn of income from that castle.

Although personally if I would be in your shoes I would rather risk him having killed in mindhunt(there is a chance that he may escape although not very high). IIRC that van has no misc slots available due to using cursed blood items and no has MR boosting items, so he would be mindhunted anyway sooner or later, if you intend to use him as a raider/assasin. That's why I was going to try to kill him rather then ask for compensation - I figured out it would be less expensive and preferable option for you, and I didn't want to push you into paying for something that technically does not violate letter of our NAP.