Re: The Joys of Overzealous Moderators
Uh, I don't really want to get involved in this (since, as I hope you understand, I have no power in the matter). But perhaps I should answer some of Executor's questions with *my understanding* of Shrapnel's actions.
-Why exactly was Cal banned?
I believe his signature was a direct insult of Bat/man. I don't remember it though.
-Why no warning but a perma ban after nearly two months?
The rationale is that it wasn't a slip-up, it was obviously a deliberate attempt to be aggressive towards another forum user. Warnings are apparently offered at Shrapnel's discretion when they believe users may change their ways.
As for the nearly two months - it's not really fair to expect Shrapnel staff to read the forums every day. Really that should be (for example) my job. But I am not much of an enforcer.
-Why didn't you check up on the whole matter?
I think they didn't think Calahan was likely to reform having so explicitly gone against forum rules.
-Is it really harassment to report rule violations? (multiple accounts) If so, are you sane?
Well I think Calahan called him a douchebag or something (not sure), rather than merely reporting it.
-If Bat/man is a double account, why isn't CrisP banned as well? Violation of your own rules again
ChrisP was banned as well, I believe.
-Did you only take someones word on it and ban the guy for no reason if he's not really CrisP?
Shrapnel did check - the two email addresses were the same(!).
-Do you even bother to check when someone reports something?
Yep, they do.
-Why are you such hypocrites?
Er...
---
I will repeat that this was not my doing - I'm just trying to explain my perception of Shrapnel's perception. Personally I'm very sorry that Calahan has been banned.
|
Threaded Mode