|
|
|
 |

October 28th, 2002, 09:21 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
Yeah, I really needed to capture some ship's Tech, and I didn't have comparatively powerful enough ships to do it by "duelling" or ambush.
But I could lurk hidden near a few Engine Destroying Mines in a Warp Point trade lane and scavenge the cripples after a few Organic Missiles. Regular mines would do more damage to those very components that I need to HighJack: EDMs do a greater proportion of damage to the engines, which I don't need, and of course hobble his supply to fire remaining weapons and power shields.
I know this stragedy is only going to work for a short time before the Sweepers put a stop to it, but without some way to get scavenged Tech at that point in the game, I was going to be totally ineffective later, and all I needed was a ship or three.
Combat Squirrel
(I really did mean to say thanks...)
|

October 29th, 2002, 03:38 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
S_J,
Typo or inside joke?
Name := Hawking Reactor
Description := Direct matter-to-energy converter utilizing a black hole as a catalyst. A vast amount of supplies can be stored in a miniscule space using this device.
Pic Num := 37
Tonnage Space Taken := 35
Tonnage Structure := 35
Cost Minerals := 1000
Cost Organics := 250
Cost Radioactives := 20000
Vehicle Type := Ship\Base
Supply Amount Used := 0
Restrictions := None
General Group := Supply
Family := 25
Roman Numeral := 0
Custom Group := 0
Number of Tech Req := 2
Tech Area Req 1 := Resupply
Tech Level Req 1 := 5000
Tech Area Req 2 := Astrophysics
Tech Level Req 2 := 2
Tech Area Req 3 := Tractor\Repulser Weapons
Tech Level Req 3 := 1
Number of Abilities := 1
Ability 1 Type := Supply Storage
Ability 1 Descr := Can store 50,000 units of supply.
Ability 1 Val 1 := 50000
Ability 1 Val 2 := 0
Weapon Type := None
|

October 29th, 2002, 03:48 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
S_J,
Also, as I am always seeking to learn, I wonder why you have reduced supply cost for all Tractor/Repulsor weapons in P&N from the 5 supply required in Gold to 0 supply required for your mod? This an interesting choice, and makes that family useful in intriquing ways....
Combat Squirrel
|

October 29th, 2002, 04:45 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
Re: Hawking reactor
That was a partly-modded Quantum Reactor. The level 5000 tech requirement is to disable it until it is ready.
Re: Supply usage.
All the weapons' supply costs have been tweaked. Supply cost is meant to represent physical supplies, such as bullets, drive fuel, and other types of consumable matter.
The other side of the coin is energy costs. That gets represented by radioactives maintenance.
As such, Energy weapons tend to have little to no supply use. They cost dearly in radioactives, though.
Bullets and missiles, on the other hand, require only token radioactives for things such as the reloading mechanism. They bleed supplies like there is no tomorrow, though.
It should be fairly obvious that the energy weapons will be best for attack fleets in enemy territory, while physical weapons are best for defense fleets, who can sit on top of resupply depots, and save maintenance costs.
__________________
Things you want:
|

October 29th, 2002, 06:18 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
Makes great sense... lasers seldom need "reloading". I first discovered this change in supply usage not from the Data files, but from trying to pounce on a (mostly) disabled enemy. Having my boarding ship get flung across the map by a hulk with no engines, no supply storage, and no other defense was an, ah, .... unexpected treat.
Why the comparative lack of smaller weapons for the Racial Tech trees? Too difficult miniturize, or unbalancing for units?
Combat Squirrel - Nosey Nate, 1st degree 
|

October 29th, 2002, 06:27 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
Really? Shoot.
I'll have to double-check those now.
I did intend to leave out some of the fancier damage-type weapons, like the energy dampers, and the seekers.
PS: thanks for inadvertently testing the "no supply use = still works when supplies are zero" thing for me
[ October 29, 2002, 16:29: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ]
__________________
Things you want:
|

October 29th, 2002, 07:32 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: To Suicide Junkie
It would be Deluxe if you do decide to expand the smaller components without giving too much additional power to the Racial Techs. If I can be of any help, let me know.
Combat Squirrel
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|