.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 16th, 2001, 12:26 AM

Tomgs Tomgs is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Winnetka, CA, USA
Posts: 357
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tomgs is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

Now that would be a fun game in itself. Sid Meier's Pirates in Space . I would love to see a game like that maybe set in a Space Empires galaxy.

[This message has been edited by Tomgs (edited 15 January 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 16th, 2001, 01:04 AM

Eisenhans Eisenhans is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Eisenhans is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

Remote Mining Bug:

When mining with a bunch of robominers on one battlestation(it's not really woth it, I know by now) I found the following:
I had 7 mineral miners, 5 organics and 2 radioactives miners on board. Each turn the value of the planet decreased by 7 percentage points for EACH of the ressources. This should be changed to 7/5/2 in this case, i.e. it should depend on how much is mined of the specific ressource and not on the maximum for one ressource.

I'd love to see the pirates too! Especially those component stealing ones. They would have really crazy ships!
The intel project is perfect too.

(Funny how we're beta-testing a full-release, no? But then: that's kind of part of the fun )
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 16th, 2001, 03:28 AM
Instar's Avatar

Instar Instar is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Instar is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

More neutral AIs as in more in number during the game? Or more to choose from during setup?
__________________
When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, a high-speed monorail could easily link New York with Chicago.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 16th, 2001, 08:12 PM

Nyx Nyx is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fairfield, Iowa
Posts: 268
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nyx is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

I'd like trade to become more important. Right now weak empires want to trade with strong ones to get big bonuses. Big empires have no reason to trade with anyone. And I mean treaties not trade offers. Here on earth, trade is very important. Cutting external trade to a nation cripples its economy, even if the nation is essentially self-sufficient. I'd like to see something like that implemented in the game. I don't, for the life of me, know how, but I know I'd like to see it.

I'd like to see the scoring system fixed. Right now there are several ways to get an amazingly high score while being exceptionaly weak. For example, the scoring system counts numbers of ships and bases, not what's on them. So a baseship with a master computer and nothing else, sitting in orbit mothballed has about 4 times the effect on your score as a cruiser decked out with weapons and actively crushing your enemies.

Morale bonuses and penalties for battle need to extend beyong the system where the battle is fought. They need to have empire-wide effects. If I send a few hundred ships to their deaths in a far off corner of the galaxy, this should make my people unhappy. But it doesn't. Similarly, if I am victorious in battle capturing a new system from my enemy, this should make my people happy, but it doesn't. Battles only effect the morale of the planets in the same system as they occur. Blech!

I despreately want to see planet conditions get the same treatment that Atmosphere got. There is no reason to even delude yourself into thinking that a race from ice worlds with no atmosphere would use a Climate Improvement Facility to make a planet more hospitable to a race who lives on methane-based Gas Giants. My optimal conditions should be deadly to someone else, and mild to a third party. Just implement "Conditions types 1-5" or go with the Star Trek Class-system, but do something!

Low populations need to have severe production penalties, and the best way to do this would be as a formula, not as a list of population sizes and bonuses/penalties.

Ruins could have interesting things like a neutral race, an advanced ship, resources, or even something dangerous. Limiting it to tech is a little dull.

I'll back the people who want to see fighters as starting tech. I don't understand why I can build interstellar craft, but not interplanetary ones. However, I'd much prefer the idea for variable starting tech. Not necessarily totally random, but it would be nice if different races had differnt starting techs.

A race from a Gas Giant shouldn't be terribly happy living on an Ice World. Sure they can learn how, but it's just not the right environment for them. Same with people from Rock worlds on Gas Giants. right now there's a 1:5 ratio for population and facilities on domed:not colonies. I'd like to see a 1:3:5 with the 3 for not domed wrong planet type.

Domed planets, wrong world type, and conditions should all LIMIT, not modify, LIMIT happiness levels. It's too easy to get lots of modifications to happiness and overcome any penalty. But limiting the total happiness makes those worlds much more likely to get upset, and makes choosing your targets in war much more important.

Someone recently posted something about wanting plagues to spread, and I really liked that idea. Who ever posted it pat yourself on the back for me.

I'd like to see environmental resistance effect maximum population.

------------------
Compete in the Space Empires IV World Championship at www.twingalaxies.com.
__________________
Compete in the Space Empires IV World Championship at www.twingalaxies.com.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 16th, 2001, 09:33 PM

Sabre21 Sabre21 is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Idaho, USA
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sabre21 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

What I would like to see is the ability to create specific ships, facilities, and components for a specific race. If this can be done already, will someone please enlighten me Plus I would like the ability to set certain starting techs to individual races. This way, say the Romulans would get cloaking very early while the Hydrans had fighters. (OK..so I'm a bit of a Trek fanatic)Of course this can be done to some degree by re-arranging the research tree in the Race AI files.

I really like Nyx's idea about having Ruins have more than tech...the advanced ship or race idea is great..kinda like civilization.
Maybe add a few bloopers to it too, like a plague or wild savages which kills off the colonists..hehe.

One more item..not overly important, but I would like a confirmation window when saving a game...basically saying "Do you want to save this game..yes or no". More than once I have inadvertently saved over a different saved game by accident...OK so I have 10 thumbs too. Would be nice to have anyways.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 17th, 2001, 12:35 AM
Tampa_Gamer's Avatar

Tampa_Gamer Tampa_Gamer is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Posts: 862
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tampa_Gamer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

Sabre21 - cloaking is a non-issue until the next patch. The AI will not use it even if their ships are equipped. I stealthy ships built into a racial trait I created for my Darlok, but trashed it after I figured out the non-cloaking bug. Basically I created a set of low-level cloaking components that required the racial trait. So I wouldn't screw up the designs, I made 0k tonnage and required it to be on every ship the race made, thus all their ships/bases/sats were "stealthy" as the Romulan would be. So it works, we just need to wait until the next patch to match the Romulans against the Darlok!
__________________
No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country.
-General George S. Patton
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 17th, 2001, 01:02 AM

jonas jonas is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
jonas is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Non A.I. issues for upcoming patch

You bet! In fact, some of them should be primitives with a tech level of zero: no discoveries, and no idea how to make any either.

It'd also be nice if warp drive was a discovery you had to make -- that way you could give it to neutrals near your rivals and suddenly they're a problem. Though I guess that eliminates the only distinction between neutral and AI-controlled player. Hmm. Maybe eliminate that distinction and instead have a score for expansiveness? Empires with a score of zero wouldn't expand beyond their home system, but could at least send warp ships against their enemies' home planets in retaliation.

quote:
Originally posted by SirDarwin:

Yes seeing more neutral little empires spread through out the galaxy would defenitly be cool, providing a variable in the settings file for the percentage of systems with life would be a nice touch.



Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.