|
|
|
|
|
February 21st, 2004, 07:39 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
|
February 21st, 2004, 08:03 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 97
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
I just saw this Last night. I went against Pythium with 2 Theurgs. One cast (let's call him "Joe") Communion Master and the other ("Fred") cast Communion Slave. Then the next Messages were "Fred casts communion master" and "Joe casts communion slave"! It was ok for me since they didn't actually USE the power they gained, but still....
|
February 21st, 2004, 08:16 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Quote:
Originally posted by PDF:
Here's a shot of a Deathmatch fight between an Inquisitor and a Golden Naga Pretender
Look at the Inq's spells cast... No comment !
|
It's not that stupid. That's a witch hunter from the picture. That means that it has fire 2 and astral 1. The only spell I can see it using to damage the Naga is star fires.
|
February 21st, 2004, 08:20 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: twilight zone
Posts: 2,247
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Quote:
Originally posted by Graeme Dice:
It's not that stupid.
|
The stupid part is casting Slave and then Master, unless that combo actually works, which it isn't supposed to ...
|
February 21st, 2004, 08:45 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Land of the Setting Sun
Posts: 195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
I see it mostly as a "look at the stupid, unwinnable fight my god got me into... mebbe if I act crazy she'll go away"
Actually, I suspect the AI puts a high value on casting CS but includes itself when "looking" to see if there are any Slaves before casting CM. One "fix" might be to require a minimum of two available slaves before the AI is willing to cast CM.
~Aldin
[ February 21, 2004, 18:45: Message edited by: aldin ]
__________________
He either fears his fate too much, Or his deserts are small,
That dares not put it to the touch To gain or lose it all
~James Graham
|
February 21st, 2004, 09:37 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 529
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Is this with the latest patch? By the way, has anyone noticed an improvement in AI spellcasting with 1.08?
|
February 21st, 2004, 10:02 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 404
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Did you have star fires researched? If the mage dont have any usefull spell to cast it does not really matter which useless spell it casts.
[ February 21, 2004, 20:09: Message edited by: mivayan ]
|
February 21st, 2004, 10:31 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Eh, cast Body Ethereal, Personal Luck, Astral Weapon and charge. The audience wants to see blood, not a mage sitting there trying to commune with himself.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
February 22nd, 2004, 12:35 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Some precisions :
This was a battle between AIs, in 2.08, and I just witnessed the match as Pythium without participating !
After the masterful CM+CS casts, the Marignon mage didn't even try Star Fire and was eaten by the Naga ...
Funniest was that in the end the Naga was killed by a Prophet Vanjarl who get it exhausted fighting Phantasmal Warriors ! This spell was a really good choice this time (at first I found it silly as the PW just delayed the Naga for one or two rounds ...)
[ February 21, 2004, 22:43: Message edited by: PDF ]
|
February 22nd, 2004, 05:40 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 289
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Proof of stupid AI spellcasting
Then you should rename the thread PDF, because your example proves nothing.
This was a mistake of the strategic AI sending to the arena a mage that knew no combat spells (ie, had a little thau research, but no evo or alt research). Mages default to cast, if the mage just knows crap he will cast crap regardless of how good or bad the spell AI be.
Despite the nay-sayers, the spell AI is one of the best parts of the game. You want some proof? get the same mage, research evo1 & thau1 and send him to the arena...he will cast star fires instead of com master/slave. But you cannot plant melons & expect apples to grow.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|