|
|
|
 |
|

May 25th, 2004, 12:21 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Deception
Tell us what you think about the following hypothetical:
Player A creates pseudonym B to join a game. In IRC chat, A solicits from B's opponents their strategies and plans, while never revealing that A, in fact, is B.
[ May 24, 2004, 23:24: Message edited by: Zen ]
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|

May 25th, 2004, 12:30 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 338
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Is this like that other post that got deleted?
|

May 25th, 2004, 01:47 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Deception
This is obviously loaded poll Reverand. Option 1 and 2 deals with person A. Option 3 implicitly deals with person B, not A. You have bundled it together, while they are clearly separate issues.
Let me give you example. Suppose somebody went to the night park alone and without weapon, and got mugged and suffered life-threating insuries as the result.
Should that person know better? Perhaps. Does it mean that his assaulter was right in his actions? Of course not.
It is not exactly the same case here, but I think you see my point. Question of whether it was "(un)effective" or not have nothing to do question is it was "reprehensible" or not, since they can very well be both at the same time. Therefore as it is your test is not very meningfull or objective.
(heh, thanks to your and other people critic of my own polls, I am now much more aware of such matters  )
If you want to make it rigth it you should separate questions related to person A and questions related to person B, not to slap them together. Otherwise it doesn't make much sense.
[ May 25, 2004, 00:58: Message edited by: Stormbinder ]
|

May 25th, 2004, 01:49 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Yeah, and he should have had a choice, "It's not the deception, it's the whining that bothers me."
And given that the votes add up to more than 100%, I'd say that multiple choices were possible. More whining.
[ May 25, 2004, 00:51: Message edited by: Cainehill ]
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

May 25th, 2004, 01:56 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Quote:
Originally posted by Cainehill:
And given that the votes add up to more than 100%, I'd say that multiple choices were possible. More whining.
|
Cainehill is correct--all choices are possible, you can select that you think the behavior is both reprehensible AND no big deal, and at the same time ineffective.
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|

May 25th, 2004, 01:57 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Double post.
[ May 25, 2004, 00:57: Message edited by: Reverend Zombie ]
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|

May 25th, 2004, 02:04 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Deception
|

May 25th, 2004, 02:17 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobart, Australia
Posts: 772
Thanks: 7
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
__________________
There are 2 secrets to success in life:
1. Don't tell everything you know.
|

May 25th, 2004, 02:57 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,425
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Deception
Of course. As I've mentioned before on the chat I am Cainehill's father.
CAINEHILL! I AM YOUR FATHER!
[ May 25, 2004, 01:57: Message edited by: Norfleet ]
|

May 25th, 2004, 03:01 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Deception
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|