.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 3: The Awakening

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 1st, 2009, 02:26 PM
PsiSoldier's Avatar

PsiSoldier PsiSoldier is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
PsiSoldier is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Ok if a Flaming weapons bless counts as a Magic weapon but only the Fire damage portion of the attack counts as magic then if a unit was Ethereal And also had 100% Fire resist would the Flaming weapons actually hit the unit all the time or would the Ethereal portion work so that he was only hit 25% of the time since the FR would presumably counter the Flaming weapons???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old March 1st, 2009, 06:05 PM
ano's Avatar

ano ano is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
ano is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

I'm pretty sure second part is correct. Only fire damage is magic, bless doesn't actually make initial weapon damage type magic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old March 1st, 2009, 06:36 PM

llamabeast llamabeast is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
llamabeast will become famous soon enoughllamabeast will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Oh, I would have said the opposite. Needs a test I guess!
__________________
www.llamaserver.net
LlamaServer FAQ
My mod nations: Tomb Kings and Vampire Counts
A compilation of high quality mod nations: Expanded Nations Packs
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old March 1st, 2009, 09:20 PM

chrispedersen chrispedersen is offline
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
chrispedersen is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Quote:
Originally Posted by llamabeast View Post
Oh, I would have said the opposite. Needs a test I guess!

I would guess with you llama - when the unit is blessed, it says magic weapons.

Additionally, jag warriors tear through ethereal faster than I think can be explained merely by only the fire portion being magical.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old March 1st, 2009, 10:26 PM
Baalz's Avatar

Baalz Baalz is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
Baalz will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Easy to test conclusively, does it pop mistform under the same conditions?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old March 2nd, 2009, 08:39 PM
ano's Avatar

ano ano is offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
ano is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

When I once played (and in the end won) as Mictlan with W9D9 and was facing a high-defense\MR Vampire Queen under mistform, my jags never managed to dispel it while they could hit that 1HP from time to time. I understood it so that as she resisted that 2 AN+MR damage, their weapon stopped being magic.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old March 2nd, 2009, 08:58 PM
archaeolept's Avatar

archaeolept archaeolept is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
archaeolept is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

yes, ano is correct, I believe.

so 100% FR will negate the magicality of the weapon, and ethereality will operate. However, chrisp's observation is also the case, IME, ie. that w/ operative flaming weapons the regular attack also is fully effective against ethereal targets.

I wouldn't think that 75% FR would stop the regular attack being efficacious against ethereality, but I am not sure.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old March 2nd, 2009, 11:18 PM
cleveland's Avatar

cleveland cleveland is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: guess - and you'll be wrong
Posts: 834
Thanks: 33
Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
cleveland is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Flaming Weapons only add the Fire secondary effect. It does NOT make the base weapon magic.

Test results of F10 blessed jaguar warriors against fog-warriored Abyssian infantry.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Flaming Weapons Test.jpg
Views:	300
Size:	78.8 KB
ID:	7849

Note that this is fundamentally different than Flaming Arrows. Flaming missiles are magic AND have the Fire secondary effect.

Cheers,
cleveland
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cleveland For This Useful Post:
  #9  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 04:30 PM
Jazzepi's Avatar

Jazzepi Jazzepi is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
Jazzepi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Cleveland, you are too pro.

Can I be like you?

Jazzepi
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old March 3rd, 2009, 09:23 PM
DonCorazon's Avatar

DonCorazon DonCorazon is offline
Colonel
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
DonCorazon is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless

Evidence based medicine. Thanks Cleve!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.