vs AI Tournament (Actually a Campaign)

[Roman]

Remember, I want to participate.

[Double_Deuce]

Originally Posted by Roman

Remember, I want to participate.

Then you need to review this post "RCW "vs AI Campaign" Force Purchase Guidelines" and submit your starting OOB selection in this thread. Make sure you count the 59 points you need to use for the HQ unit against the 400 total force points.

[iCaMpWiThAWP]

I'll redo then:

1xUseless HQ unit (+59)
9xRifle section (+144)
2xMaxim HMG (32 support) (+32)
1x82mm mortar (64 support (+32)
1xEngineers(regular ones) (85 support) (+21)
2xScouts (+26)
4xrifle section (+64)
1xFAI (+17)

A company of 13 Sections.
Looks like i got luxury resources with my armoured car.
If i'm not mistaken that brings the total to 395.

My force looks weird, i'm still thinking i lack something in my core...

[Double_Deuce]

Originally Posted by iCaMpWiThAWP

My force looks weird, i'm still thinking i lack something in my core...

Your campaign files are just about ready, rechecking some things.

[gila]

Hi DD,
If not too late.heres what i would go with:

HQ-59
Mountain Co.-291
82 mortar sec.-46
Total core pts. 396

Sorry for the large font size

My Em is: rockawybch@yahoo.com

[Double_Deuce]

Originally Posted by gila

Hi DD,
If not too late.heres what i would go with:

HQ-59
Mountain Co.-291
82 mortar sec.-46
Total core pts. 396

Sorry for the large font size

My Em is: rockawybch@yahoo.com

No Mountain Troops. You need to pick units piece by piece from the text file in the attachment of this post "RCW "vs AI Campaign" Force Purchase Guidelines". Those are the only troops types allowed.

[iCaMpWiThAWP]

Are we dealing with supply and reinforcements on the operational scale? Are we really bothering with the operational part of the campaign?(if we had a supreme commander, who'd control those things and order our movement we would have a pretty interesting game)it could be nice to know how are our forces doing...

[Double_Deuce]

Originally Posted by iCaMpWiThAWP

Are we dealing with supply and reinforcements on the operational scale? Are we really bothering with the operational part of the campaign?(if we had a supreme commander, who'd control those things and order our movement we would have a pretty interesting game)it could be nice to know how are our forces doing...

Yes and no. For this test run there is no operational commander among the player team. In previous games I have found that a supreme commander does not usually work well unless that person is NOT involved in the actual battles as they tend to hoard resources for their own unit as opposed to distributing them to the other commanders. Its not always the case but after 10 years of running these that the reality. There are some who play their role impartially very well but they are few and far between. With a separate operational commander, this means they would plan the operational moves and allocate replacements but would not play any SP battles. You either play as overall commander or as a subordinate and fight the actual battles, not both.

Originally Posted by Roman

It could produce an operational map? to get an idea of how is the campaign in general. I saw the Google map. We are fighting on a peninsula?
Another question: We have reinforcements?

Right now I have a basic campaign story outline I have written and will use that to decide reinforcements (Support Points) and replacements (Build Points) for your forces. How well you do in each battle also has an effect on what you receive from higher headquarters.